Warrior General Games

GUT

Originally posted by mwoods07
Ugh, I give...it's obvious that fixing a blown radiator hose with duct tape is far easier than replacing the hose so things run the way they should...oh well.

It's obvious that the blown radiator hose isn't going to get fixed so you might as well just drive the car as long as it still works.

Originally posted by IggyWH
Keep denying that you've ever exploited the shit out of GLB. Show me one ship that wasn't full of what was easily exploitable that season and I'll bow down.

is this guy serious

I think we won last season's ship using a nerfed S11 exploit

Well yeah... think you caught us so we can admit it now. We rode that exploit to a ton of sacks and a W.... wait wat?


Stay classy

I didn't know we were referring to Jedi as an exploit now

Originally posted by kanaan
Originally posted by Jiddy78

However, since you dropped the NT into coverage,


/discussion TBH


Not to mention:


"I was using real football as a guide."

C'MON.

did you see Cody for Alabama with a pick after dropping back into coverage, it is called zoneblitzing

Apparently the NCAA never saw Cody's INT.

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/playerDetail.jsp?yr=2009&org=8&player=62

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2009/Internet/ranking_summary/2009000000008int.html

Originally posted by jrry32
Ok here are the 3 problems, 1 many of the blitzes that succeeded, you either didn't bring the ROLB or the MLB got the sack before the ROLB was near the OL, 2 unlike IRL, QBs aren't smart enough to scramble away from the overloading side and 3 you blitzed the MLB through a gap that would never be open IRL. Come on, it was exploit blitzing.

There's only 2 types of blitzing in this game. Exploit and stupid.

While the blocking logic doesn't care about trying to get a pre-snap read or, hell, even care about how many times it's done the same damn thing and given up the sack, so-called "exploit" blitzing will be the only type of blitzing worth doing.

Originally posted by zbuckley
I didn't know we were referring to Jedi as an exploit now

those of us from APL have been doing so for about 5-6 seasons

Originally posted by kurieg
There's only 2 types of blitzing in this game. Exploit and stupid.

While the blocking logic doesn't care about trying to get a pre-snap read or, hell, even care about how many times it's done the same damn thing and given up the sack, so-called "exploit" blitzing will be the only type of blitzing worth doing.

I agree, and my only thought is how about use it in moderation, instead of every 3rd down play using the exploit...maybe put it in for 25% of the plays called or something. To me it's about integrity, someone else said "it's there, just use it". Well, yes, use it, but if you have some integrity you would not OVERUSE it to the point of obtaining a win you otherwise would not get.

I guess all I am saying is if you can't beat a team using normal (and by that I only mean NON-EXPLOITED, not creative) tactics, don't resort to something that MANY (not all) people would call "cheap". Do your best and if you win, awesome, if you lose so be it. In all honesty, it just reminds me of things like the Nancy Kerrigan incident or Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield...sure both people had the ability to do what they did, and sure it may have helped their chances (not successfully) of creating an upset...but it still is looked upon unfavorably. Why play the game just to win something you may not deserve and have most people looking down at the whole situation. Most of us are here just to have a good time, we aren't winning big bucks or anything!!!

Originally posted by mwoods07
I agree, and my only thought is how about use it in moderation, instead of every 3rd down play using the exploit...maybe put it in for 25% of the plays called or something. To me it's about integrity, someone else said "it's there, just use it". Well, yes, use it, but if you have some integrity you would not OVERUSE it to the point of obtaining a win you otherwise would not get.

It really shouldn't be up to us to police that though. In my opinion, use it as much as you want... just be prepared to get called out if you lose while using it.

Originally posted by mwoods07
Do your best and if you win, awesome, if you lose so be it. In all honesty, it just reminds me of things like the Nancy Kerrigan incident or Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield...sure both people had the ability to do what they did, and sure it may have helped their chances (not successfully) of creating an upset...but it still is looked upon unfavorably.

The funny thing about your analogy is something like the Tyson-Holyfield fight. First, what Tyson did is nothing like blitzing in GLB - Tyson broke the rules of the game, lost his licence (banned) and got fined millions of dollars.

Blitzing in GLB is like what Holyfield was doing to Tyson in that fight. Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab - because the other guy can't figure out how to stop it.

Not even going to touch a planned assault analogy.

Seriously, your plan is to suggest some acceptable % for different plays that we'll all just agree on? Good luck with that.

kinda like how Nick Saban stole the patriots Audibles and nobody really cared after they shut them down 21-0

Originally posted by kurieg
Blitzing in GLB is like what Holyfield was doing to Tyson in that fight. Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab - because the other guy can't figure out how to stop it.

There's a pretty big difference between "can't figure out how to stop it" and "is impossible to stop".

In my opinion, that distinction is the key part in defining an exploit.

Originally posted by Gart888

There's a pretty big difference between "can't figure out how to stop it" and "is impossible to stop".

In my opinion, that distinction is the key part in defining an exploit.


I think you're probably right, but have some of my testing to do.

However, it is at least possible to avoid and still win games... maybe.