Warrior General Games

I dont care how they do it, what day it falls on, and how they sub out. It would be nice to see a pro bowl team and than bonus money for that player.

Even if there is no game played or sim...it would be nice to have a log where it get added to that players profile as an award or something.

Originally posted by justafish2002

- In 3rd row, you'll see passingScore(arr). Scroll left until you see score = score* (arr)["Pct"]/100). Remove the /100 to get official score.


I'm confused. When I remove the /100 from the script, I get a number that is exactly 100 times greater than the score I get if I remove it. Why am I supposed to remove it, again?

Originally posted by Capaneus
Originally posted by justafish2002


- In 3rd row, you'll see passingScore(arr). Scroll left until you see score = score* (arr)["Pct"]/100). Remove the /100 to get official score.


I'm confused. When I remove the /100 from the script, I get a number that is exactly 100 times greater than the score I get if I remove it. Why am I supposed to remove it, again?

So it compares with the QBs I've already done.

Two critiques.

1. I think Ints are currently undervalued for Dbacks, especially in comparison to PD. A PD is 2 pts and an Int is 3. It would take 3 straight PDs to force a change in possession, but only one Int, usually with better field position. I would suggest 1.5 pts for a PD and 3 for an Int, or 2 for a PD and 4 for an Int. I might even go higher. I would also value Ints higher than FF, as an FF doesn't always result in a change of possesion.

2. Even if Bort adds Sacks Allowed, I'm still no sure that there's a good way to compare O-line players based on stat lines. Sometimes making a block and holding it is better than a pancake. Unfortunately, I don't have a good suggestion on how to fix this.

Originally posted by justafish2002

OLine: (Pancakes/5)-(Sacks Allowed)
The problem with this is that it favours linemen who play on Special Teams, as more pancakes happen on ST plays.

Originally posted by Capaneus
Two critiques.

1. I think Ints are currently undervalued for Dbacks, especially in comparison to PD. A PD is 2 pts and an Int is 3. It would take 3 straight PDs to force a change in possession, but only one Int, usually with better field position. I would suggest 1.5 pts for a PD and 3 for an Int, or 2 for a PD and 4 for an Int. I might even go higher. I would also value Ints higher than FF, as an FF doesn't always result in a change of possesion.

2. Even if Bort adds Sacks Allowed, I'm still no sure that there's a good way to compare O-line players based on stat lines. Sometimes making a block and holding it is better than a pancake. Unfortunately, I don't have a good suggestion on how to fix this.

1.My thinking on the defensive formula was this: a turnover gives you the ball right away and PD is almost getting an INT. I figured catching the ball was about 1 third of an INT (finding ball and position on WR), so a PD should be worth 2/3 of an INT.

Fumbles I thought of FF as presenting the opportunity and creating the turnover while a FR was just a right place; right time stat.

2.A successful block percentage would have to be figured out. Something like (TotalBlocks- (AllowedSacks+AllowedHurry+TackleMadeByHisMan)/TotBlocks

Originally posted by justafish2002
Originally posted by Capaneus

Two critiques.

1. I think Ints are currently undervalued for Dbacks, especially in comparison to PD. A PD is 2 pts and an Int is 3. It would take 3 straight PDs to force a change in possession, but only one Int, usually with better field position. I would suggest 1.5 pts for a PD and 3 for an Int, or 2 for a PD and 4 for an Int. I might even go higher. I would also value Ints higher than FF, as an FF doesn't always result in a change of possesion.

1.My thinking on the defensive formula was this: a turnover gives you the ball right away and PD is almost getting an INT. I figured catching the ball was about 1 third of an INT (finding ball and position on WR), so a PD should be worth 2/3 of an INT.

Fumbles I thought of FF as presenting the opportunity and creating the turnover while a FR was just a right place; right time stat.

I agree with Capaneus. His reasoning makes more sense in a "how does it help your team" way. There should be a big difference between putting yourself in position to make a big play and actually making a big play. PDs are nice but INTs can change games.

Not a bad idea...

+1

every team must have at least one player go

Originally posted by Maddencoach
I dont care how they do it, what day it falls on, and how they sub out. It would be nice to see a pro bowl team and than bonus money for that player.

Even if there is no game played or sim...it would be nice to have a log where it get added to that players profile as an award or something.



agree, nice thing to show you for your hard work building a good player

Alright I changed the DB formula a bit.

From our continuing dicussion of how to improve DBack rankings over in USA Pro:

Originally posted by drazz00
If you want to get at least something of the run support a CB does as opposed to their tackles in the pass game, check their TFL stats. I can't think of any time a WR caught a pass for a loss.

Good thought. Currently a TFL is worth 1.5 pts for both D-line and DBack players. I don't see anything wrong with bumping that up to 2 pts for DBacks to reward run stuffing CBs. I don't think that's going to be a dramatic change though.

Originally posted by Capaneus
From our continuing dicussion of how to improve DBack rankings over in USA Pro:

Originally posted by drazz00

If you want to get at least something of the run support a CB does as opposed to their tackles in the pass game, check their TFL stats. I can't think of any time a WR caught a pass for a loss.

Good thought. Currently a TFL is worth 1.5 pts for both D-line and DBack players. I don't see anything wrong with bumping that up to 2 pts for DBacks to reward run stuffing CBs. I don't think that's going to be a dramatic change though.

Good thought, I've adjusted the formula once more.

Any new suggestions?