I think its about time that we get something going All Star wise. Its getting towards the end of the season and would be nice to have an idea of who will tally the votes etc and a day when it should be done so we can get some input from our teams etc.
Morphius
offline
offline
This seasons pro bowlers are gonna be pretty one sided. The East got to pound on Michigan all season. All but one team so far has put up over 100 points on them. Some players pulling out 20+ TDs, 50+ Pancakes, 10+ PDs, 5+ Sacks and much more. One HB came away with 855 Rushing yards and 22 TDs!
Not that I care all that much. I find it quite hilarious really. I just think that in the end if people don't take into account those games, the East will rule the rosters.
Not that I care all that much. I find it quite hilarious really. I just think that in the end if people don't take into account those games, the East will rule the rosters.
GwennA
offline
offline
Originally posted by Morphius
This seasons pro bowlers are gonna be pretty one sided. The East got to pound on Michigan all season. All but one team so far has put up over 100 points on them. Some players pulling out 20+ TDs, 50+ Pancakes, 10+ PDs, 5+ Sacks and much more. One HB came away with 855 Rushing yards and 22 TDs!
Not that I care all that much. I find it quite hilarious really. I just think that in the end if people don't take into account those games, the East will rule the rosters.
Potential disparities in the two are part of the reason we do one all-star team for the west, one for the east.
Without getting into any other East vs. West discussion or trying to make guesses as to depth and quality, I fully acknowledge that Michigan is about as bad as it gets.
But I don't really see how that has any impact on East all-stars and West all stars when the teams draw an all-star team from each separately.
as far as the East goes, everyone played the same teams, with the only thing really separating them in terms of quality of opponent faced being those who faced Akron before a lot of the roster was sold off, and those who faced them after. If two players are more or less tied, I'd give weight to the guy who played vs. Akron early on.
This seasons pro bowlers are gonna be pretty one sided. The East got to pound on Michigan all season. All but one team so far has put up over 100 points on them. Some players pulling out 20+ TDs, 50+ Pancakes, 10+ PDs, 5+ Sacks and much more. One HB came away with 855 Rushing yards and 22 TDs!
Not that I care all that much. I find it quite hilarious really. I just think that in the end if people don't take into account those games, the East will rule the rosters.
Potential disparities in the two are part of the reason we do one all-star team for the west, one for the east.
Without getting into any other East vs. West discussion or trying to make guesses as to depth and quality, I fully acknowledge that Michigan is about as bad as it gets.
But I don't really see how that has any impact on East all-stars and West all stars when the teams draw an all-star team from each separately.
as far as the East goes, everyone played the same teams, with the only thing really separating them in terms of quality of opponent faced being those who faced Akron before a lot of the roster was sold off, and those who faced them after. If two players are more or less tied, I'd give weight to the guy who played vs. Akron early on.
Last edited Aug 27, 2008 13:42:52
Morphius
offline
offline
Originally posted by GwennA
Originally posted by Morphius
This seasons pro bowlers are gonna be pretty one sided. The East got to pound on Michigan all season. All but one team so far has put up over 100 points on them. Some players pulling out 20+ TDs, 50+ Pancakes, 10+ PDs, 5+ Sacks and much more. One HB came away with 855 Rushing yards and 22 TDs!
Not that I care all that much. I find it quite hilarious really. I just think that in the end if people don't take into account those games, the East will rule the rosters.
Potential disparities in the two are part of the reason we do one all-star team for the west, one for the east.
Without getting into any other East vs. West discussion or trying to make guesses as to depth and quality, I fully acknowledge that Michigan is about as bad as it gets.
But I don't really see how that has any impact on East all-stars and West all stars when the teams draw an all-star team from each separately.
as far as the East goes, everyone played the same teams, with the only thing really separating them in terms of quality of opponent faced being those who faced Akron before a lot of the roster was sold off, and those who faced them after. If two players are more or less tied, I'd give weight to the guy who played vs. Akron early on.
I forgot we seperated them last season.
Originally posted by Morphius
This seasons pro bowlers are gonna be pretty one sided. The East got to pound on Michigan all season. All but one team so far has put up over 100 points on them. Some players pulling out 20+ TDs, 50+ Pancakes, 10+ PDs, 5+ Sacks and much more. One HB came away with 855 Rushing yards and 22 TDs!
Not that I care all that much. I find it quite hilarious really. I just think that in the end if people don't take into account those games, the East will rule the rosters.
Potential disparities in the two are part of the reason we do one all-star team for the west, one for the east.
Without getting into any other East vs. West discussion or trying to make guesses as to depth and quality, I fully acknowledge that Michigan is about as bad as it gets.
But I don't really see how that has any impact on East all-stars and West all stars when the teams draw an all-star team from each separately.
as far as the East goes, everyone played the same teams, with the only thing really separating them in terms of quality of opponent faced being those who faced Akron before a lot of the roster was sold off, and those who faced them after. If two players are more or less tied, I'd give weight to the guy who played vs. Akron early on.
I forgot we seperated them last season.
GwennA
offline
offline
Originally posted by Nike-Joe
Smersh and Fallon for co-Frist Team HB.
Frist has his own all-star team now?
Smersh and Fallon for co-Frist Team HB.
Frist has his own all-star team now?
jkdog855
offline
offline
When considering safeties you have to realize we have a pretty good defense and my guy is almost leading in FFs. He is also the 2nd leading tackler on the team. My PDs are very low because I can shut down TEs for the most part and my tackles from from the run game or from CBs that get beat.
Nike-Joe
offline
offline
D is really hard to do. For DBs, tackles and PDs are bad things, shows you are getting picked on. A DB with a ton of plays, and NO stats, is the best DB.
For DL, sacks are sacks. Can't argue with that. And for DL, tackles, and ratio of tckles to missed takles, is big. FF is also big.
For LBs, is is a combo of both.
Anyway, the O stats are less arguable. Smersh and Fallon, despite splitting carries, have the best stats in BBB 15. you can't argue with that.
For DL, sacks are sacks. Can't argue with that. And for DL, tackles, and ratio of tckles to missed takles, is big. FF is also big.
For LBs, is is a combo of both.
Anyway, the O stats are less arguable. Smersh and Fallon, despite splitting carries, have the best stats in BBB 15. you can't argue with that.
jmsne
offline
offline
I think we should change the format slightly..
QB
RB
RB
FB
TE
WR
WR
WR
T
T
G
G
C
DE
DE
DT
DT
LB
LB
LB
LB
CB
CB
CB
FS
SS
KR
PR
That way we don't have to argue about who the best LT/RT LG/RG DT/NT etc.. MLB or LLB just the best players at the position regardless of where they line up within that position.
QB
RB
RB
FB
TE
WR
WR
WR
T
T
G
G
C
DE
DE
DT
DT
LB
LB
LB
LB
CB
CB
CB
FS
SS
KR
PR
That way we don't have to argue about who the best LT/RT LG/RG DT/NT etc.. MLB or LLB just the best players at the position regardless of where they line up within that position.
sockcornnoodles
offline
offline
Originally posted by jmsne
That way we don't have to argue about who the best LT/RT LG/RG DT/NT etc.. MLB or LLB just the best players at the position regardless of where they line up within that position.
+1
That's the way I did my votes last year.
That way we don't have to argue about who the best LT/RT LG/RG DT/NT etc.. MLB or LLB just the best players at the position regardless of where they line up within that position.
+1
That's the way I did my votes last year.
Originally posted by jmsne
That way we don't have to argue about who the best LT/RT LG/RG DT/NT etc.. MLB or LLB just the best players at the position regardless of where they line up within that position.
I agree with this completely. I changed the setup in the West to match.
That way we don't have to argue about who the best LT/RT LG/RG DT/NT etc.. MLB or LLB just the best players at the position regardless of where they line up within that position.
I agree with this completely. I changed the setup in the West to match.
emir
offline
offline
Originally posted by Nike-Joe
D is really hard to do. For DBs, tackles and PDs are bad things, shows you are getting picked on. A DB with a ton of plays, and NO stats, is the best DB.
For DL, sacks are sacks. Can't argue with that. And for DL, tackles, and ratio of tckles to missed takles, is big. FF is also big.
For LBs, is is a combo of both.
Anyway, the O stats are less arguable. Smersh and Fallon, despite splitting carries, have the best stats in BBB 15. you can't argue with that.
Guess im a beast then since i have almost no tackles or PD's
D is really hard to do. For DBs, tackles and PDs are bad things, shows you are getting picked on. A DB with a ton of plays, and NO stats, is the best DB.
For DL, sacks are sacks. Can't argue with that. And for DL, tackles, and ratio of tckles to missed takles, is big. FF is also big.
For LBs, is is a combo of both.
Anyway, the O stats are less arguable. Smersh and Fallon, despite splitting carries, have the best stats in BBB 15. you can't argue with that.
Guess im a beast then since i have almost no tackles or PD's
Erica
offline
offline
Originally posted by emir
Originally posted by Nike-Joe
D is really hard to do. For DBs, tackles and PDs are bad things, shows you are getting picked on. A DB with a ton of plays, and NO stats, is the best DB.
For DL, sacks are sacks. Can't argue with that. And for DL, tackles, and ratio of tckles to missed takles, is big. FF is also big.
For LBs, is is a combo of both.
Anyway, the O stats are less arguable. Smersh and Fallon, despite splitting carries, have the best stats in BBB 15. you can't argue with that.
Guess im a beast then since i have almost no tackles or PD's
there should be a thread for people to plea for votes instead of putting it in here
Originally posted by Nike-Joe
D is really hard to do. For DBs, tackles and PDs are bad things, shows you are getting picked on. A DB with a ton of plays, and NO stats, is the best DB.
For DL, sacks are sacks. Can't argue with that. And for DL, tackles, and ratio of tckles to missed takles, is big. FF is also big.
For LBs, is is a combo of both.
Anyway, the O stats are less arguable. Smersh and Fallon, despite splitting carries, have the best stats in BBB 15. you can't argue with that.
Guess im a beast then since i have almost no tackles or PD's
there should be a thread for people to plea for votes instead of putting it in here
Booster4324
offline
offline
Hey Emir, do you need one of those directional pointers for Erica so she can pull the dagger out?
Bad Erica. He is your teammate. Booster spank
Bad Erica. He is your teammate. Booster spank
Erica
offline
offline
Originally posted by Booster4324
Bad Erica. Booster spank
Not even full sentences, like a caveman
Bad Erica. Booster spank
Not even full sentences, like a caveman
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
