Just kidding. Hopefully a good game with no injuries 
UB are u starting trouble again. Now how many time do I have to tell you to stop instigating. Your benched. Dam i don't have the authority to bench you. Going to be a very good game. 
Last edited Jul 15, 2008 20:30:06
secondeye
offline
offline
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage )
)nittany2b
offline
offline
Originally posted by secondeye
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage )
Well I hate to say it, but now that they've boosted I don't think anyone in this conference has a shot in hell.
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage
)Well I hate to say it, but now that they've boosted I don't think anyone in this conference has a shot in hell.
riccor25
offline
offline
Originally posted by secondeye
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage )
Man I couldn't agree more. I was thinking the same thing.
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage
)Man I couldn't agree more. I was thinking the same thing.
SAVAGE OPS
offline
offline
Originally posted by riccor25
Originally posted by secondeye
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage )
Man I couldn't agree more. I was thinking the same thing.
That could happen!
Originally posted by secondeye
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage
)Man I couldn't agree more. I was thinking the same thing.
That could happen!
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by riccor25
Originally posted by secondeye
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage )
Man I couldn't agree more. I was thinking the same thing.
then he gets hit by the sportsmanship penalty and sent back down the following season
Originally posted by secondeye
I hate to say it, but I'm rooting for LV. They can go up a level with their single agent owned team, and I'd like to see the same old crew back at it again in Season 4. (We gotta beat you at least once, Savage
)Man I couldn't agree more. I was thinking the same thing.
then he gets hit by the sportsmanship penalty and sent back down the following season
Last edited Jul 16, 2008 10:05:36
riccor25
offline
offline
Sportsmanship penalty won't effect people who own the entire team. That's a misunderstanding of a post that Bort made. Basicly Bort came out and described a sportsmanship penalty for people who bring in high level players in a low level league. Then people started asking him to apply it to the people who own the whole team, and he never said that's what he was going to do. There was a great post about this last week, but with no search function it's probably impossible to find now.
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by riccor25
Sportsmanship penalty won't effect people who own the entire team. That's a misunderstanding of a post that Bort made. Basicly Bort came out and described a sportsmanship penalty for people who bring in high level players in a low level league. Then people started asking him to apply it to the people who own the whole team, and he never said that's what he was going to do. There was a great post about this last week, but with no search function it's probably impossible to find now.
thanks, that is correct
Sportsmanship penalty won't effect people who own the entire team. That's a misunderstanding of a post that Bort made. Basicly Bort came out and described a sportsmanship penalty for people who bring in high level players in a low level league. Then people started asking him to apply it to the people who own the whole team, and he never said that's what he was going to do. There was a great post about this last week, but with no search function it's probably impossible to find now.
thanks, that is correct
hntrr31
offline
offline
Bort also stated that teams with multiple owners will have an advantage over teams owned by only a few owners.
riccor25
offline
offline
Originally posted by stahu miguel
Bort also stated that teams with multiple owners will have an advantage over teams owned by only a few owners.
It has something to do with how fast the sportsmanship pool refreshes. I'm not 100% sure on this.....
Everyone starts out with the same sportsmanship score. I think teams with one owner or only a few owners either don't gain sportsmanship points at all, or they don't gain them as fast. If a team never does anything to lessen it's sportsmanship score then it won't have to worry about regenerating it. Therefore, a team with one person isn't really penalized if he/she never does anything that will lower the sportsmanship score.
I've been accused of thinking I know it all (which is far from the truth) so I'm not going to argue with anyone. If you understand things differently then I'd like to know what you know.
Bort also stated that teams with multiple owners will have an advantage over teams owned by only a few owners.
It has something to do with how fast the sportsmanship pool refreshes. I'm not 100% sure on this.....
Everyone starts out with the same sportsmanship score. I think teams with one owner or only a few owners either don't gain sportsmanship points at all, or they don't gain them as fast. If a team never does anything to lessen it's sportsmanship score then it won't have to worry about regenerating it. Therefore, a team with one person isn't really penalized if he/she never does anything that will lower the sportsmanship score.
I've been accused of thinking I know it all (which is far from the truth) so I'm not going to argue with anyone. If you understand things differently then I'd like to know what you know.
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by stahu miguel
Bort also stated that teams with multiple owners will have an advantage over teams owned by only a few owners.
I wish I knew the number of owners if this was the case. Not that I think I would have a problem on any teams, just curious who would
Bort also stated that teams with multiple owners will have an advantage over teams owned by only a few owners.
I wish I knew the number of owners if this was the case. Not that I think I would have a problem on any teams, just curious who would
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
