Warrior General Games

Would these sa's work on a blocking full back or should I are they worth it.

1. work.
2. not worth.

I agree with aaasahi. Especially Aura (not worth). Pummel is interesting though. It really works better for O-linemen because they are involved in many more blocking plays than a FB would be and that's why I'd say it really depends on how many blocking plays your FB is going to get involved in. If it's a lot, then I'd consider it. If not, then it's not worth it. Value = amount of usage + effectiveness. (IMO)

cut block, get low, or run block

Originally posted by TJ Spikes
cut block, get low, or run block



ya I already have cut block as a piece of aeq and have run block as my extra sa I was+ just curious as if pummel and aura would be a option also.

Pummel is a good choice. Aura works, but the FB spends less time with it active than an offensive lineman, tight end, or blocking WR.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Pummel is a good choice. Aura works, but the FB spends less time with it active than an offensive lineman, tight end, or blocking WR.

Well speaking of blocking te's jd I will be having a blocking te coming up in the ranks soonand you always give good advice, I take it pummel and aura would be a good fit for a blocking te then?

Originally posted by Bluesman
Well speaking of blocking te's jd I will be having a blocking te coming up in the ranks soonand you always give good advice, I take it pummel and aura would be a good fit for a blocking te then?

I'm betting he'll say yes to Pummel at the very least. I've even been pondering it for my Power WR which blocks a lot on outside run plays and on ST's as well.

Originally posted by Bluesman
Well speaking of blocking te's jd I will be having a blocking te coming up in the ranks soonand you always give good advice, I take it pummel and aura would be a good fit for a blocking te then?
Yes. If you add Aura then make sure to add the Intimidation VA as well.