User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Small but easy change to game that could solve issue of build-time blues.
Theo Wizzago
Coyote
offline
Link
 
Dunno why this never crossed my mind before but I think it could work and requires little effort from the GLB coding minds (or what's left of them).
#1, increase the length of the seasons and the number of games played.
Right now we play 16 game seasons. Increasing that to 18 or even 20 game seasons would accomplish 2 things. One would be LESS seasons needed. (confused?) If every season is 2 to 4 games longer then it would take less seasons for dots to play in until plateau is reached. Most likely an entire season. Second is that also Second would be less OFF season as well (less seasons = less off seasons of doing nothing). Overall, the amount of time it take to build a dot wouldn't change too much... but the FEELING that your dot is doing something RELEVANT would increase since you'd have one less 'off season' to deal with and longer build times during each season to work on your dots.
#2, of course, increasing the length of the seasons would also require increasing the length of Plateau before the start of decline. This addresses the complaints of those that really wish their dots would last at plateau longer.

It's not a huge change, but an easy one that address two issues without a need to recode the entire dot building process. The Issue of the feeling of TOO MUCH time spent doing nothing while waiting for the dots to grow and the desire of longer dot relevance once plateau is reached.
I'm not sure how clear I am with this suggestion so if you have an issue or idea, post and we can figure it out or address it. Thanks.
 
haole
the one who knocks
offline
Link
 
I can't believe people are still making suggestions
 
zz man
offline
Link
 
I like the idea although to be fair there have been a few during the current climate....would be nice to hear other opinions
 
Guppy, Inc
offline
Link
 
think about the the scheduling issues. right now, every team plays the same teams. i always hated the old way because some teams got an easy non-conf game and others had to play good teams. that gave a huge advantage to some teams.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
think about the the scheduling issues. right now, every team plays the same teams. i always hated the old way because some teams got an easy non-conf game and others had to play good teams. that gave a huge advantage to some teams.


play-offs settle everything, unless the site fixes the game!
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
too big to read all this. Better to decrease flex prices.
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
not small changes
 
Mike Martz
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by haole
I can't believe people are still making suggestions


 
Theo Wizzago
Coyote
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
think about the the scheduling issues. right now, every team plays the same teams. i always hated the old way because some teams got an easy non-conf game and others had to play good teams. that gave a huge advantage to some teams.


I think it would force more inter-conference games otherwise you'd be playing some teams more than twice. I have no issue with that.
 
Bane
Baconologist
offline
Link
 
I didn't read, but I M sure this will save GLB

*1
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.