Warrior General Games

Pretty self explanatory, if you want more ownership and less CPU teams, make buying a team less flex? Just a thought. No way should a rookie/pee wee team be 400 flex

Meh, it would be nice, but realistically, players cost way more (except O-line and k/p)

I 2nd this notion

I heard that lowering flex cost on stuff is something mute that's more than likely not gonna happen.

But even so, 400 flex for a one season team isn't a lot. I also don't think 1000 flex is a lot for a regular team.

So -shrug-.

I don't think teams being CPU owned is the issue. The issue is the lack of players. They need fewer teams, not more. Increase the price so that there's less reason to have CPU filled teams in every league.

Originally posted by skip-dmp
I don't think teams being CPU owned is the issue. The issue is the lack of players. They need fewer teams, not more. Increase the price so that there's less reason to have CPU filled teams in every league.

My thinking was this. Decrease the number of teams and leagues in general but not to a drastic amount. This still would leave many CPU teams. By decreasing the amount of flex a team costs, these CPU teams can become human owned. Now what does this do? It could lead to many owners saving flex to build more players for his/her own team, thus increasing the number of overall dots. CPU owned teams serve absolutely no purpose, atleast having a human owned team would lead to a push for recruitment and/or owners making own dots.

I could be wrong, once again just a thought.

Make buying teams more exciting!

Originally posted by kagushun
400 flex for a one season team isn't a lot. I also don't think 1000 flex is a lot for a regular team.

It wasn't in 2008. 2015? It's a lot.

Originally posted by Sha222
I could be wrong, once again just a thought.

you're wrong. there are tons of human owned teams completely filled by cpus. there are no players left, and even if teams were free, what good is 1 or 2 players? cpu owned teams are at least competitive at lower levels up to regpro. human owned teams with no players are completely noncompetitive. all you have to do is look at just about any league to see how few players there are. there are even cpu teams left in pros even after the reduction.

If team ownership was cheaper I would create more dots, tbh.

Originally posted by F00tballJunkie
Make buying teams more exciting!

this is what they should have done. instead of every stadium being identical, give owners options building stadiums might have been fun those 1st few seasons, but now its just tedious.

Most of the joy in ownership is naming the team and adding a logo.

bring back the waiting list!!!

Originally posted by Dub J
It wasn't in 2008. 2015? It's a lot.





True - I'd own a team again if it was cheaper.

CO owners can help with donate flex-owning solo is a tough gig