Warrior General Games

I am starting to work on a couple players (1-lber and 1-ss) players that will be made run stop basically.
Question I have is on super vision it says that the sa will work better with players that have high vision. Initially I have a plan that will take vision to around 76 if it works out. Would that be high enough to put sp's in the supervision sa to make that sa worthwhile?

Also on the aeq I will put 2 pcs with make tackle % but the rest of the aeq will be used for the sa's I am planning on using.
Should I be concerned about not having and break blocks on these players?

Originally posted by Bluesman
I am starting to work on a couple players (1-lber and 1-ss) players that will be made run stop basically.
Question I have is on super vision it says that the sa will work better with players that have high vision. Initially I have a plan that will take vision to around 76 if it works out. Would that be high enough to put sp's in the supervision sa to make that sa worthwhile?

Also on the aeq I will put 2 pcs with make tackle % but the rest of the aeq will be used for the sa's I am planning on using.
Should I be concerned about not having and break tackle on these players?

you do not want break tackle % on defensive players. you arent trying to break tackles, youre trying to make tackles. make tackle % is what you want like you said.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
you do not want break tackle % on defensive players. you arent trying to break tackles, youre trying to make tackles. make tackle % is what you want like you said.

oops, I meant break blocks

Originally posted by lemdog


i guess you like to break tackles on d... ok. casual life i guess. keep on keepin on big guy.

Originally posted by Bluesman
oops, I meant break blocks


for a safety, i would probably go with MT%, AF%, DB%.

for the HHLB, 2 mt% and idk what else. guess it depends how you really want to use him.

Originally posted by lemdog


Ya lem, I gave myself a for that blunder

A hard hitting lb is a waste IMO, ff big hit etc

All strength lb with 2 bb and 2 mt with fs is nice in this current sim

Originally posted by Bluesman
Ya lem, I gave myself a for that blunder

Well it was directed at prokop I knew what you meant

Originally posted by lemdog
Well it was directed at prokop I knew what you meant

ive seen plenty of FAs with AEQ that doesnt work for a certain position. idk if this guy knew that or not.

welcome to the FAQ forum.

he's on L.A. Resistencia. he cant be that good if kboum let him on the team.

Both players will be geared to help stop the run game but not going to worry about chit like causing fumbles are anything like that to won't have monster hit ,force fumble or head hunter on them. More like wrap up tackle, diving tackle and the make tackle% maybe the avoid fake% also depends on how the build finishes out.

Main thing I am curious about is wold having vision around 75 be sufficient to make supervision work better.

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4483837

Pretty ideal IMO, maybe a touch more strength, db% is a waste on a hard hitter like this

Originally posted by Bluesman
Both players will be geared to help stop the run game but not going to worry about chit like causing fumbles are anything like that to won't have monster hit ,force fumble or head hunter on them. More like wrap up tackle, diving tackle and the make tackle% maybe the avoid fake% also depends on how the build finishes out.

Main thing I am curious about is wold having vision around 75 be sufficient to make supervision work better.

Yeah I don't for sure but I would shoot for 80 vis on the lb whether you have ever sv or not. My previous str lbs I didn't go with sv, I just doubled up bb and mt with 8-10 in fs with everything else in attributes

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
he's on L.A. Resistencia. he cant be that good if kboum let him on the team.

I am a chitty dot builder didn't you know that PK, dam I thought everyone knew that