Warrior General Games

Where do you find out what the penalty is for out of position players? I would assume an OT at WR would be insane but what about a FB at HB or a TE at WR? What about Gs across the O-Line?

There's no confirmed, hard and fast info out there on this. At all.

There are, however, some nuggets of info that people have pieced together based on statements from admins and speed-script analysis. Someone will post that here shortly.

But here's the thing... you're usually better off playing a fair-to-bad player in-position than a good player out of position. If you're seriously considering OOP dots to fill a roster hole, what you really need to do is improve your recruiting.

This is more of trying an exploit that I have seen work against a particular team. In University I have found that using TEs at WR gives me an advantage on running plays and a rTE can usually catch the ball somewhat effectively. I do not think it would work most of the time in passing situations.

Originally posted by Backes-to-Backes
This is more of trying an exploit that I have seen work against a particular team. In University I have found that using TEs at WR gives me an advantage on running plays and a rTE can usually catch the ball somewhat effectively. I do not think it would work most of the time in passing situations.

There's exceptions, hence why I said "usually."

Originally posted by Backes-to-Backes
This is more of trying an exploit that I have seen work against a particular team. In University I have found that using TEs at WR gives me an advantage on running plays and a rTE can usually catch the ball somewhat effectively. I do not think it would work most of the time in passing situations.

it's not an exploit

Originally posted by Backes-to-Backes
This is more of trying an exploit that I have seen work against a particular team. In University I have found that using TEs at WR gives me an advantage on running plays and a rTE can usually catch the ball somewhat effectively. I do not think it would work most of the time in passing situations.

Possible but WR's built for the application will still preform better at the job than TE's doing the same thing but playing OOP. As for the 'info' I believe the LOWEST damage you get is a 5% hit for being OOP. And, yes, the damage seems greater the more OOP a player is. So a HB at QB takes a hit but not as bad as a WR at QB.

Originally posted by Bane
it's not an exploit
It is an exploit because defensive coordinators can't set conditional inputs for wide receivers.

Originally posted by jdbolick

It is an exploit because defensive coordinators can't set conditional inputs for wide receivers.

it's not an exploit

Originally posted by jdbolick

It is an exploit because defensive coordinators can't set conditional inputs for wide receivers.

lol

Originally posted by AC
lol

Don't you have a self proclaimed forum to be comfortable in?

Originally posted by Backes-to-Backes


Don't you have a self proclaimed forum to be comfortable in?



AC doesnt self proclaim forums.

Forums self proclaim AC.

Well I guess when we build an entire op team will find out and let you know

See always a butt with a frog............................Green nation will bring OOP to light for S47 folks, move along, put yer hoodies and skittles down and ponder

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Possible but WR's built for the application will still preform better at the job than TE's doing the same thing but playing OOP. As for the 'info' I believe the LOWEST damage you get is a 5% hit for being OOP. And, yes, the damage seems greater the more OOP a player is. So a HB at QB takes a hit but not as bad as a WR at QB.

%5 is correct my good man

My theory is that bort takes the flex cost heavily into the OOP %s. A TE at WR isnt going to be simply a 5%. Probably like 10%. Even worse for O-line since O-line is 100 FP.