People who pay for dots want to see them on the field, and Bort wants team identities. Plus, it shakes up current cookie cutter builds as everybody learns to adjust. Everybody wins.
Forum > Suggestions > Reduce team roster size by 2 players every season for the next 10 seasons
bhall43
offline
offline
Stamina would need reworking lowering the number to 35. You would have so many dead players. Would make the running game that much more drastically effective with ST's and long, slow, methodical morale and energy depressing drives killing teams.
SteveMax58
offline
offline
Yeah not sure about 35 but I like the idea of reducing roster sizes in general. You can basically have your cake & eat it too today with specialists of all types. Would be more interesting if you had to skimp on certain things to be better at other things.\
So +1 for the concept.
So +1 for the concept.
JLEVESQUE25
offline
offline
Originally posted by SteveMax58
Yeah not sure about 35 but I like the idea of reducing roster sizes in general. You can basically have your cake & eat it too today with specialists of all types. Would be more interesting if you had to skimp on certain things to be better at other things.\
So +1 for the concept.
Yeah not sure about 35 but I like the idea of reducing roster sizes in general. You can basically have your cake & eat it too today with specialists of all types. Would be more interesting if you had to skimp on certain things to be better at other things.\
So +1 for the concept.
maxxmisery DTD
offline
offline
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
35 seems a little low. 45 would be a better end number
I like this a whole lot
35 seems a little low. 45 would be a better end number
I like this a whole lot
Originally posted by JLEVESQUE25
Originally posted by SteveMax58
Yeah not sure about 35 but I like the idea of reducing roster sizes in general. You can basically have your cake & eat it too today with specialists of all types. Would be more interesting if you had to skimp on certain things to be better at other things.\
So +1 for the concept.
Originally posted by SteveMax58
Yeah not sure about 35 but I like the idea of reducing roster sizes in general. You can basically have your cake & eat it too today with specialists of all types. Would be more interesting if you had to skimp on certain things to be better at other things.\
So +1 for the concept.
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
but then i have to cut ppl.
People in prison do it all the time, it's not that hard.
but then i have to cut ppl.
People in prison do it all the time, it's not that hard.
Originally posted by Jamiam73~Cult~
People in prison do it all the time, it's not that hard.
canadian prisons are just full of people hugging and making macaroni pictures. no violence, not even in prison.
People in prison do it all the time, it's not that hard.
canadian prisons are just full of people hugging and making macaroni pictures. no violence, not even in prison.
Hmmm... I can see some merit to this. Agree that some serious stamina issues would need to be addressed. +1
SteveMax58
offline
offline
Originally posted by Little M
If you want smaller rosters, there is this new GLB2 game.
So they built an entire game around this idea? I bet its awesome then!
If you want smaller rosters, there is this new GLB2 game.
So they built an entire game around this idea? I bet its awesome then!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























