Sheer curiosity- have teams been successful in GLB using a 'different' base defense (5-2, 4-4, Nickel) than the 4-3/3-4 standards? I'm pondering doing an experiment team around an odd defense to see the results, and was seeing if there were any reference points to start with.
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > "Other" Base defenses
Man... when I first started I ran a sh*t ton of the 44. Love that D. But, over time, it seems like LB's got nerfed to the point where it's kinda not worth it.
I run a nickel/dime defense (3 DL)
Blitz a lot of CBs and build some CBs that can tackle and it's pretty fun
Blitz a lot of CBs and build some CBs that can tackle and it's pretty fun
MileHighShoes
offline
offline
Originally posted by B1G
I run a nickel/dime defense (3 DL)
Blitz a lot of CBs and build some CBs that can tackle and it's pretty fun
This has come into vogue lately.
Run a 3-3-5 with the CB2 slot reserved for KL/FF types. Like having a LOLB you can line up nearly everywhere on the strong side of the field.
I run a nickel/dime defense (3 DL)
Blitz a lot of CBs and build some CBs that can tackle and it's pretty fun
This has come into vogue lately.
Run a 3-3-5 with the CB2 slot reserved for KL/FF types. Like having a LOLB you can line up nearly everywhere on the strong side of the field.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
