Warrior General Games

Obviously, there are player demand tendencies that have been around for years, but it can be fixed. Simply make a low demand players cost 50 extra to buy and boost, and very low demand players 100 to buy and boost, and for high demand, 50 less, and very high demand, 100 less. The boosting price should never change over the duration of the players career. Therefore, if an agent pays 1200 a season to boost his HB every season, another agent could be paying as little as 600, depending on when the HBs were bought. Obviously the mere fact that a player is in low or high demand has no affected agents to change the way they buy players. So this is the only effective, reasonable fix I could think of. It has to be done

the problem is that the demands are not necessarily the true demands. It doesn't take into account how many rookie players there are etc

so I don't think it would work how it should

Well make the demand, or at least the cost of the players be a reflection of only day 0-39 players.

perhaps for day 40 take the demand from the aged 40-79 players, and from there on just take it from day 0 players this way, if there was a tendency last season, it will be far less likely to reoccur

-1 because there's no way to code common sense into the game and this would cause greasemonkey scripts to roll over and die

yeah well fuck you

Originally posted by VincentJG
yeah well fuck you

I was goin to vote but due to your shitty attitude I won't.......btw flex cost changes are on the NGTH list

i could see tying the initial flex cost to supply and demand, but having the boosting cost of one HB be 600 and another 1200 because it was created (perhaps) a day earlier or, at some points on Days 40/41, even earlier in the same day, is silly.

not to mention that

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
I ..btw flex cost changes are on the NGTH list

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Originally posted by VincentJG

yeah well fuck you

I was goin to vote but due to your shitty attitude I won't.......btw flex cost changes are on the NGTH list

that's more for the people asking for a reduction in flex costs....

this idea has been kicked around the forums before, I'll get a ruling on it

Originally posted by VincentJG
yeah well fuck you


+1

Originally posted by Chysil
the problem is that the demands are not necessarily the true demands. It doesn't take into account how many rookie players there are etc

so I don't think it would work how it should

True, I could make 50 punters and fuck with everyone.

Originally posted by VincentJG
yeah well fuck you

That's the best way to get a suggestion voted on, make people feel like you're an asshole.

Make it more expensive for a position that is hard to find a team for? wait wat?