Formation subs exist for TE, HB, FB, and QB, how about adding WRs to the list
thanks!
thanks!
Forum > Suggestions > formations subs for WRs
bhall43
offline
offline
Already a NGTH in GLB1.
It was however a thing for the first part of testing in GLB2 but Bort pulled it because it allowed you to manipulate Blocking WR's wherever you wanted without the defense being able to react.
It was however a thing for the first part of testing in GLB2 but Bort pulled it because it allowed you to manipulate Blocking WR's wherever you wanted without the defense being able to react.
Originally posted by bhall43
Already a NGTH in GLB1.
It was however a thing for the first part of testing in GLB2 but Bort pulled it because it allowed you to manipulate Blocking WR's wherever you wanted without the defense being able to react.
See - for this case NGTH means, probably not going to happen because we have to test it out first to see if there's a way for it to be exploited.
Already a NGTH in GLB1.
It was however a thing for the first part of testing in GLB2 but Bort pulled it because it allowed you to manipulate Blocking WR's wherever you wanted without the defense being able to react.
See - for this case NGTH means, probably not going to happen because we have to test it out first to see if there's a way for it to be exploited.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
