Warrior General Games

Pretty much what the title says. Either you have an awesome play you want to show off and get 'Votes' or you have a wonky play that you want Dahman to help you lament over from a private scrim. Well... this suggestion, would make these things possible!!

AirMcMVP addition: need to be checked off by both owners (and/or co-owners).

INB4 rail on Suggestion because it's a Mod and lolGLB

As long as both owners agree, why not?

+lolGLB

I mean, +1.

+1

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
As long as both owners agree, why not?

+lolGLB

I mean, +1.

Yeah, that would be needed!

+1

+1

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
As long as both owners agree, why not?

+lolGLB

I mean, +1.

no problem with this one, but lots of other things I'd like to see higher on priority for being implemented

Hey Phil... if you're feeling industrious, I believe this has been suggested before. Something like having a "check box" available to make a(any) PLAY from a Private game be publicly viewable. If I remembers rightly. Could be worthy of a "link".

Private means Private.

NGTH

Originally posted by Phantom Of The Opera
Private means Private.

NGTH

This.

OP basically says let private scrims be public

Originally posted by Phantom Of The Opera
Private means Private.

NGTH

Originally posted by Shöcks
This.

OP basically says let private scrims be public


No...

It marks one play public, just one. In case you missed it, just one play. Did I mention, it's just one play.

Also, as added, both owner's / co-owner's would have to agree to mark that ONE PLAY public.

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Hey Phil... if you're feeling industrious, I believe this has been suggested before. Something like having a "check box" available to make a(any) PLAY from a Private game be publicly viewable. If I remembers rightly. Could be worthy of a "link".

Yeah, I figured it probably was suggested before. If you want to send me the link, I'll merge this into that one. Otherwise, I'll let this one ride.

Originally posted by BadgerPhil
No...

It marks one play public, just one. In case you missed it, just one play. Did I mention, it's just one play.

Also, as added, both owner's / co-owner's would have to agree to mark that ONE PLAY public.

But I feel like if you wanted your plays to be viewable, you would have chosen a public scrim.
Am I the only person who tests plays/schemes I don't really want others seeing in private scrims?

However, I understand the viewpoint this is coming from now,
so +1.

Originally posted by Shöcks
But I feel like if you wanted your plays to be viewable, you would have chosen a public scrim.
Am I the only person who tests plays/schemes I don't really want others seeing in private scrims?

However, I understand the viewpoint this is coming from now,
so +1.

The point is, sometimes there's a play that happens in a private scrim that is worth sharing. An incredible play be a defender. A HB who breaks 15 tackles on a 99 yard TD run. A play dahman play. A bugged play.

If you require both team owners to approve a play being made public then you mitigate the chances that some super secret scheme that's being tested won't be seem until the desired time.