Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Should "Regional Minor Casual" CPU Kickers be able to hit 57.5 yard FGs?
BadgerPhil
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bane
Originally posted by jdbolick
Yes.
Just not every time and should be less than half the time. The dot missed on from the same distance in that game and by the end of the season probably won't even be close to 50% on long field goals.
For it's career, the dot is 2 for 6 on 50+ yard field goals, seems about right.
Originally posted by jdbolick
Yes.
Just not every time and should be less than half the time. The dot missed on from the same distance in that game and by the end of the season probably won't even be close to 50% on long field goals.
For it's career, the dot is 2 for 6 on 50+ yard field goals, seems about right.
Regional Minor human dots? I can understand that. Regional Minor CPU dots? I'm not quite as sure there. CPU dots have more evenly distributed attributes and put points into SAs, iirc. Unless SAs are stronger than attributes I have a hard time finding this reasonable. That said, as long as it doesn't happen at a high percentage I guess its not totally unreasonable.
hokegoalie
offline
offline
These dots are not even halfway to completion if they were a human dot and a cpu dot at the same age can hit near max range kicks for end builds...ever? One out of ten is too often. Garbage.
dahman32
offline
offline
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Regional Minor human dots? I can understand that. Regional Minor CPU dots? I'm not quite as sure there. CPU dots have more evenly distributed attributes and put points into SAs, iirc. Unless SAs are stronger than attributes I have a hard time finding this reasonable. That said, as long as it doesn't happen at a high percentage I guess its not totally unreasonable.
"CPU dots have more evenly distributed attributes"
Wonder why CPU dots never show their attributes, yet we can say something of this nature?
Where's this data so we can see it as well?
Regional Minor human dots? I can understand that. Regional Minor CPU dots? I'm not quite as sure there. CPU dots have more evenly distributed attributes and put points into SAs, iirc. Unless SAs are stronger than attributes I have a hard time finding this reasonable. That said, as long as it doesn't happen at a high percentage I guess its not totally unreasonable.
"CPU dots have more evenly distributed attributes"
Wonder why CPU dots never show their attributes, yet we can say something of this nature?
Where's this data so we can see it as well?
Originally posted by CyberNinja
Honey Badgers Don't Care
Ha, that's my old team
Honey Badgers Don't Care
Ha, that's my old team
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
