Edited by Kelts on Jun 3, 2013 17:23:10
Kelts
offline
offline
Phantom Of The Opera
offline
offline
We tried this many seasons ago, and people would break the pact and start boosting and adding CEQ. It didn't work out TBH.
andersonba1210
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gerr
Careful what you post on stuff like this, the mod's are quick to ban.
We want greater freedom and less taxation! Power to the people!
Careful what you post on stuff like this, the mod's are quick to ban.
We want greater freedom and less taxation! Power to the people!
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
People boost and buy CE now?
lolsuckers
You call them suckers here, but they are cheaters in regular leagues if they don't boost? I don't get it.
People boost and buy CE now?
lolsuckers
You call them suckers here, but they are cheaters in regular leagues if they don't boost? I don't get it.
Dub J
offline
offline
lol Obviously you don't.
I stated non-boosters tanking games to help another non-booster make the playoffs is cheating. (I also provided a couple of links to prove my point).
If you think the pricing structure for PW is good then I don't know what to tell you, bro.
I stated non-boosters tanking games to help another non-booster make the playoffs is cheating. (I also provided a couple of links to prove my point).
If you think the pricing structure for PW is good then I don't know what to tell you, bro.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
lol Obviously you don't.
I stated non-boosters tanking games to help another non-booster make the playoffs is cheating. (I also provided a couple of links to prove my point).
If you think the pricing structure for PW is good then I don't know what to tell you, bro.
The pricing structure of peewee is horrible. The pricing structure of this entire game is horrible when it comes to dots. I just retired a WR that was getting one target a game but was costing me a lot to boost every season. I like value. I get a lot of bang for my buck in underground leagues and I wish people like you would leave us alone. Pretty much the only reason I still play this game. I don't tank games, if someone did in the past it has nothing to do with me whatsoever.
lol Obviously you don't.
I stated non-boosters tanking games to help another non-booster make the playoffs is cheating. (I also provided a couple of links to prove my point).
If you think the pricing structure for PW is good then I don't know what to tell you, bro.
The pricing structure of peewee is horrible. The pricing structure of this entire game is horrible when it comes to dots. I just retired a WR that was getting one target a game but was costing me a lot to boost every season. I like value. I get a lot of bang for my buck in underground leagues and I wish people like you would leave us alone. Pretty much the only reason I still play this game. I don't tank games, if someone did in the past it has nothing to do with me whatsoever.
Dub J
offline
offline
People like me leave underground leagues alone? WTF are you talking about? Only time I've said anything about UL was when they were intentionally fucking up a regular league I was associated with and when you started that disaster of a thread in FAQ.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
You talked all kinds of shit. Guess you were trying to impress someone or just get attention. You were saying teams that don't boost have no business joining tournaments and should receive unfair and biased treatment, were cheaters, and were not competitive against boosted teams.
Dub J
offline
offline
No, I talked all kinds of shit to you in one thread because you were being ridiculous with your "Bert is out to get non-boosters" accusations. You make it as if I've waged some kind of holy war against non-boosters or something.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
You were saying teams that don't boost have no business joining tournaments.
No, I asked why you was getting so worked up about it when non-boosters have -0- chance of winning tourneys in the regular leagues outside rookie. I also stated that teams with CPU rosters and non-boost teams should be low seeds in the tourney.
Me thinks you exaggerate shit to prove invalid points.
You were saying teams that don't boost have no business joining tournaments.
No, I asked why you was getting so worked up about it when non-boosters have -0- chance of winning tourneys in the regular leagues outside rookie. I also stated that teams with CPU rosters and non-boost teams should be low seeds in the tourney.
Me thinks you exaggerate shit to prove invalid points.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
No, I talked all kinds of shit to you in one thread because you were being ridiculous with your "Bert is out to get non-boosters" accusations. You make it as if I've waged some kind of holy war against non-boosters or something.
I said nothing about Bort. I wanted to know how official tourney seeds were calculated. You had no answer but spewed of a bunch of anti non booster biased bull shit. I always thought official tourney seeds were random, obviously they are not. That is why I asked how they were figured.
Ellis Belle just flat lied to me about trophies for underground leagues. We tried to negotiate with her back during the first season of NFL peewee. She stated only GLB sanctioned tourneys would receive trophies from there on out. Now she gives them out for about anything except underground leagues. Things that are not even close to tourneys get trophies. So I know admin are very biased against non boosters and custom leagues. Rules are suppose to be rules, that is how things stay fair.
With that I certainly have my suspicions of why 6 of the 10 teams to enter the tournament that did not get byes were MLF teams. All 6 MLF teams entered in fact. All slated to play each other so half of the teams would be eliminated before the real tourney started. You then inserted Bert's peewee into your mouth and started your anti non booster crap.
Call me a cheater and I'm not going to be very happy.
No, I talked all kinds of shit to you in one thread because you were being ridiculous with your "Bert is out to get non-boosters" accusations. You make it as if I've waged some kind of holy war against non-boosters or something.
I said nothing about Bort. I wanted to know how official tourney seeds were calculated. You had no answer but spewed of a bunch of anti non booster biased bull shit. I always thought official tourney seeds were random, obviously they are not. That is why I asked how they were figured.
Ellis Belle just flat lied to me about trophies for underground leagues. We tried to negotiate with her back during the first season of NFL peewee. She stated only GLB sanctioned tourneys would receive trophies from there on out. Now she gives them out for about anything except underground leagues. Things that are not even close to tourneys get trophies. So I know admin are very biased against non boosters and custom leagues. Rules are suppose to be rules, that is how things stay fair.
With that I certainly have my suspicions of why 6 of the 10 teams to enter the tournament that did not get byes were MLF teams. All 6 MLF teams entered in fact. All slated to play each other so half of the teams would be eliminated before the real tourney started. You then inserted Bert's peewee into your mouth and started your anti non booster crap.
Call me a cheater and I'm not going to be very happy.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
No, I asked why you was getting so worked up about it when non-boosters have -0- chance of winning tourneys in the regular leagues outside rookie. I also stated that teams with CPU rosters and non-boost teams should be low seeds in the tourney.
Me thinks you exaggerate shit to prove invalid points.
Maybe they should get lower seed but is that the rules? 43 teams are not going to win that tourney and we are probably better than at least half of them.
No, I asked why you was getting so worked up about it when non-boosters have -0- chance of winning tourneys in the regular leagues outside rookie. I also stated that teams with CPU rosters and non-boost teams should be low seeds in the tourney.
Me thinks you exaggerate shit to prove invalid points.
Maybe they should get lower seed but is that the rules? 43 teams are not going to win that tourney and we are probably better than at least half of them.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
