using WR to block LB with speed on sweep plays and screens
Edited by InRomoWeTrust on May 7, 2013 21:23:30 (Unhooked)
Forum > Suggestions > Using WR to block LB w/ speed on sweep plays and screens
Dubs48
offline
offline
ok... ill try to help you out here
on outside runs you want the WR to come down and either block the LB or the in the box Safety
right?
on outside runs you want the WR to come down and either block the LB or the in the box Safety
right?
Originally posted by Dubs48
ok... ill try to help you out here
on outside runs you want the WR to come down and either block the LB or the in the box Safety
right?
right we played this in school and it was fun and usefull because WR covered by CB usually and open zone for HB/FB/RQB and make a block on LB or safety
ok... ill try to help you out here
on outside runs you want the WR to come down and either block the LB or the in the box Safety
right?
right we played this in school and it was fun and usefull because WR covered by CB usually and open zone for HB/FB/RQB and make a block on LB or safety
Dubs48
offline
offline
the only issue i see here is most crack blocks are done with motion or specific spacing...
Originally posted by bhall43
cool so the CB goes unblocked and takes out the play.
OP (I think) is calling for a 'crack screen' so the goal is for the WR to take out the LB or safety that otherwise would be covering the HB (who receives the screen). The defensive back covering the WR performing the maneuver on the LB, if in man, is pulled inside leaving space to the outside.
Alternatively, you have the OT release to ensure that there is a lane for the HB receiving the screen.
cool so the CB goes unblocked and takes out the play.
OP (I think) is calling for a 'crack screen' so the goal is for the WR to take out the LB or safety that otherwise would be covering the HB (who receives the screen). The defensive back covering the WR performing the maneuver on the LB, if in man, is pulled inside leaving space to the outside.
Alternatively, you have the OT release to ensure that there is a lane for the HB receiving the screen.
Edited by InRomoWeTrust on May 8, 2013 01:16:43
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
OP (I think) is calling for a 'crack screen' so the goal is for the WR to take out the LB or safety that otherwise would be covering the HB (who receives the screen). The defensive back covering the WR performing the maneuver on the LB, if in man, is pulled inside leaving space to the outside.
Alternatively, you have the OT release to ensure that there is a lane for the HB receiving the screen.
yep. it`s a small change and will bring more fun to both offense and defense
OP (I think) is calling for a 'crack screen' so the goal is for the WR to take out the LB or safety that otherwise would be covering the HB (who receives the screen). The defensive back covering the WR performing the maneuver on the LB, if in man, is pulled inside leaving space to the outside.
Alternatively, you have the OT release to ensure that there is a lane for the HB receiving the screen.
yep. it`s a small change and will bring more fun to both offense and defense
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
OP (I think) is calling for a 'crack screen' so the goal is for the WR to take out the LB or safety that otherwise would be covering the HB (who receives the screen). The defensive back covering the WR performing the maneuver on the LB, if in man, is pulled inside leaving space to the outside.
Alternatively, you have the OT release to ensure that there is a lane for the HB receiving the screen.
RL complicated blocking schemes don't equate to GLB. That is what I mean. I know what he is talking about.
OP (I think) is calling for a 'crack screen' so the goal is for the WR to take out the LB or safety that otherwise would be covering the HB (who receives the screen). The defensive back covering the WR performing the maneuver on the LB, if in man, is pulled inside leaving space to the outside.
Alternatively, you have the OT release to ensure that there is a lane for the HB receiving the screen.
RL complicated blocking schemes don't equate to GLB. That is what I mean. I know what he is talking about.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by dude34
yep. it`s a small change and will bring more fun to both offense and defense
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
yep. it`s a small change and will bring more fun to both offense and defense
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
Originally posted by bhall43
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
you need to find new coverage schemes for that! isn`t that fun?
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
you need to find new coverage schemes for that! isn`t that fun?
Originally posted by bhall43
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
I wrote earlier about blocking and pass rushing for both O and D linemen but it was negative maybe this will come in
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
I wrote earlier about blocking and pass rushing for both O and D linemen but it was negative maybe this will come in
sehorn31
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
LOL, Right, What B said.
Not really sure what fun it brings to the defense but ok.
LOL, Right, What B said.
sehorn31
offline
offline
Originally posted by dude34
you need to find new coverage schemes for that! isn`t that fun?
NO!!!
you need to find new coverage schemes for that! isn`t that fun?
NO!!!
AlBarsch
offline
offline
Unless the WR is a power build, the LB will just run right over him... Would love to see crackback blocks, but need right personnel
Originally posted by AlBarsch
Unless the WR is a power build, the LB will just run right over him... Would love to see crackback blocks, but need right personnel
speed can replace power cos for univercity and higher split of a second that matters
Unless the WR is a power build, the LB will just run right over him... Would love to see crackback blocks, but need right personnel
speed can replace power cos for univercity and higher split of a second that matters
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
