is there penalty for SS playing CB position?
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > penalty
theres OOP for every position not playing the exact same position. even if it is minimal, theres a penalty.
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
theres OOP for every position not playing the exact same position. even if it is minimal, theres a penalty.
but is there numbers for that? does it worse sacrifice?
theres OOP for every position not playing the exact same position. even if it is minimal, theres a penalty.
but is there numbers for that? does it worse sacrifice?
no numbers for any oop im pretty sure.
i guess if you really have to do it, you can. i cant see it being a big OOP but youre probably better off trying to find a decent CB but do what you have to.
i guess if you really have to do it, you can. i cant see it being a big OOP but youre probably better off trying to find a decent CB but do what you have to.
Fbs make good TEs. TE make OK WRs. Etc.
For similar positions (TE/FB, TE/WR, HB/FB, G/C, C/OT, OT/TE) the penalty is such that I would not hesitate to say use a rec FB at rec TE, or a faster OT at BTE.
Would I put a WR at rushing QB? Hell no.
Also, the penalty allegedly does not depend on archetype, so a BTE can play WR with a penalty equal to a RTE playing WR. Again, probably guess in the 5-10% penalty range to attribute, and you'll be close. It also does not affect VAs, but obviously if you have possession WR on a TE and put him at OT or whatever, it's null and void.
For similar positions (TE/FB, TE/WR, HB/FB, G/C, C/OT, OT/TE) the penalty is such that I would not hesitate to say use a rec FB at rec TE, or a faster OT at BTE.
Would I put a WR at rushing QB? Hell no.
Also, the penalty allegedly does not depend on archetype, so a BTE can play WR with a penalty equal to a RTE playing WR. Again, probably guess in the 5-10% penalty range to attribute, and you'll be close. It also does not affect VAs, but obviously if you have possession WR on a TE and put him at OT or whatever, it's null and void.
Originally posted by ezra_
Fbs make good TEs. TE make OK WRs. Etc.
For similar positions (TE/FB, TE/WR, HB/FB, G/C, C/OT, OT/TE) the penalty is such that I would not hesitate to say use a rec FB at rec TE, or a faster OT at BTE.
Would I put a WR at rushing QB? Hell no.
Also, the penalty allegedly does not depend on archetype, so a BTE can play WR with a penalty equal to a RTE playing WR. Again, probably guess in the 5-10% penalty range to attribute, and you'll be close. It also does not affect VAs, but obviously if you have possession WR on a TE and put him at OT or whatever, it's null and void.
so you guess it comes to 10% then if I have pure 110 speed then 10% off I get 99!? it seems too much penalty for that...even madden takes fewer
Fbs make good TEs. TE make OK WRs. Etc.
For similar positions (TE/FB, TE/WR, HB/FB, G/C, C/OT, OT/TE) the penalty is such that I would not hesitate to say use a rec FB at rec TE, or a faster OT at BTE.
Would I put a WR at rushing QB? Hell no.
Also, the penalty allegedly does not depend on archetype, so a BTE can play WR with a penalty equal to a RTE playing WR. Again, probably guess in the 5-10% penalty range to attribute, and you'll be close. It also does not affect VAs, but obviously if you have possession WR on a TE and put him at OT or whatever, it's null and void.
so you guess it comes to 10% then if I have pure 110 speed then 10% off I get 99!? it seems too much penalty for that...even madden takes fewer
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by dude34
so you guess it comes to 10% then if I have pure 110 speed then 10% off I get 99!? it seems too much penalty for that...even madden takes fewer
Yep. Usually best to avoid OOPs altogether if you can.
I've seen people use a power HB playing FB and make it work... but it's only worth trying because there's not much benefit to having a dedicated power-rushing FB taking up a roster spot that could be filled by a more-useful player.
On my own team, I use an OT to fill the 3rd TE position in goalline plays, but that's only because my team has an unusual roster and a weird offensive system that works best with only 2 TEs.
For CB... man, you should probably have at least 5 CBs on your roster anyway at a bare minimum, probably more. So there really shouldn't be a need for you to play an SS at CB at all. You'd be better off just recruiting a fair-to-middlin' CB (not even a good one) and just burying him at the bottom of the CB depth chart... he'd still probably do better than a SS at CB.
so you guess it comes to 10% then if I have pure 110 speed then 10% off I get 99!? it seems too much penalty for that...even madden takes fewer
Yep. Usually best to avoid OOPs altogether if you can.
I've seen people use a power HB playing FB and make it work... but it's only worth trying because there's not much benefit to having a dedicated power-rushing FB taking up a roster spot that could be filled by a more-useful player.
On my own team, I use an OT to fill the 3rd TE position in goalline plays, but that's only because my team has an unusual roster and a weird offensive system that works best with only 2 TEs.
For CB... man, you should probably have at least 5 CBs on your roster anyway at a bare minimum, probably more. So there really shouldn't be a need for you to play an SS at CB at all. You'd be better off just recruiting a fair-to-middlin' CB (not even a good one) and just burying him at the bottom of the CB depth chart... he'd still probably do better than a SS at CB.
Originally posted by dude34
admins? admins say nothing about that?
No. The actual OOP penalty has never been disclosed exactly like much of the rest of the math in the sim. There have been tidbits in Q&As but nothing specific.
admins? admins say nothing about that?
No. The actual OOP penalty has never been disclosed exactly like much of the rest of the math in the sim. There have been tidbits in Q&As but nothing specific.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
