You guys have a couple more mods now, corner the market, destroy the other networks. There can only be one.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Is it time for the Addicts to make a comback
Addicts as anything other than a forum with some friends left in it has been dead for a long time,
, there will be no comebacks with the original agents leading it anyways.
It is laughable to think a 5th rate organization such as the Addicts could destroy any network too,
.
For me personally, I've realized that Networks are good for Win At All Costs, not so much for the game at large or even for the eventual "have nots" in the network itself.
edit for grammar mistake.
, there will be no comebacks with the original agents leading it anyways. It is laughable to think a 5th rate organization such as the Addicts could destroy any network too,
.For me personally, I've realized that Networks are good for Win At All Costs, not so much for the game at large or even for the eventual "have nots" in the network itself.
edit for grammar mistake.
Edited by GmanV2 on Jan 14, 2013 09:53:27
I blame stu
then GMan
although the case could be made to blame GMan more than stu
then GMan
although the case could be made to blame GMan more than stu
boondocksaint
offline
offline
Originally posted by GmanV2
For me personally, I've realized that Networks are good for Win At All Costs, not so much for the game at large or even for the eventual "have nots" in the network itself.
Agreed.
Though, as the game goes it is what it is. Everyone takes a different stance on what they enjoy, and for some it is win at all costs. There's nothing wrong with that, just the same as there's nothing wrong with a team that say- is competitive in pro and has made the playoffs under the same ownership without being "affiliated" for the past 32 seasons
For me personally, I've realized that Networks are good for Win At All Costs, not so much for the game at large or even for the eventual "have nots" in the network itself.
Agreed.
Though, as the game goes it is what it is. Everyone takes a different stance on what they enjoy, and for some it is win at all costs. There's nothing wrong with that, just the same as there's nothing wrong with a team that say- is competitive in pro and has made the playoffs under the same ownership without being "affiliated" for the past 32 seasons

Originally posted by boondocksaint
Agreed.
Though, as the game goes it is what it is. Everyone takes a different stance on what they enjoy, and for some it is win at all costs. There's nothing wrong with that, just the same as there's nothing wrong with a team that say- is competitive in pro and has made the playoffs under the same ownership without being "affiliated" for the past 32 seasons
, absolutely, and I have much admiration for that! Porto is one of those storied franchises that make this game awesome and SLAP in particular.
You're right about WAAC, definitely nothing wrong with that in any way, just me personally I don't subscribe to it, not that I'd be good at it anyways if I did,
.
Agreed.
Though, as the game goes it is what it is. Everyone takes a different stance on what they enjoy, and for some it is win at all costs. There's nothing wrong with that, just the same as there's nothing wrong with a team that say- is competitive in pro and has made the playoffs under the same ownership without being "affiliated" for the past 32 seasons

, absolutely, and I have much admiration for that! Porto is one of those storied franchises that make this game awesome and SLAP in particular.You're right about WAAC, definitely nothing wrong with that in any way, just me personally I don't subscribe to it, not that I'd be good at it anyways if I did,
.Phantom Of The Opera
offline
offline
They need testers, then they will rule GLB, hahahahahahaha *evil laugh*
Originally posted by fast420
it was a good while it lasted and died a fiery death
I blame myself
it was a good while it lasted and died a fiery death
I blame myself
Edited by Dr. Showtime on Jan 14, 2013 12:46:29
vladykins
offline
offline
Originally posted by Homage
Addict were always bad at two things:
posting and dawtball
That is why I was in charge for a little bit. We needed to take our dotting and posting from third ranked to fifth ranked.
Addict were always bad at two things:
posting and dawtball
That is why I was in charge for a little bit. We needed to take our dotting and posting from third ranked to fifth ranked.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.



























