Warrior General Games

Since that the way it seems to currently work and it's not breaking anything.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5024899&page=1#46697984

Originally posted by tautology

Since that the way it seems to currently work and it's not breaking anything.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5024899&page=1#46697984

lol?

-1

sorry

Guess it comes down to if ~0.5% in a roll for is worth Bort's time to fix the code.

sure... +1

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Guess it comes down to if ~0.5% in a roll for is worth Bort's time to fix the code.

No. But in an opposite direction I'd much rather see stacking limited to 2 pieces, Anything beyond that should be worthless, IMHO. Would go far to diversify builds more.
-1

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
No. But in an opposite direction I'd much rather see stacking limited to 2 pieces, Anything beyond that should be worthless, IMHO. Would go far to diversify builds more.
-1

limiting choices would increase diversity?

edit: +1 to keeping it at 1/6

I get furious anytime I see a dot do anything.
-Rusty Trombone


-1

It's an easier choice to keep it as it is. You just have to update the info page. So why not?

Originally posted by Chessey
It's an easier choice to keep it as it is. You just have to update the info page. So why not?

For positions like QB's where only 2 %'s are really relevant, it's sort of a big deal.

well now that we know taut has a player with 4 % AEQ, this suggestion should be void until someone without vested interest makes the suggestion

Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
well now that we know taut has a player with 4 % AEQ, this suggestion should be void until someone without vested interest makes the suggestion

is this the yello1 clause?

Originally posted by Homage
For positions like QB's where only 2 %'s are really relevant, it's sort of a big deal.

I'm saying its easier to leave it alone than change it, if people decide they want to stack with 4 then nothing is stopping them to do it as well tbh.

Though taut has the advantage of already doing it.

Let it ride

Originally posted by bigtisme
limiting choices would increase diversity?

edit: +1 to keeping it at 1/6

Right now, folks simply pile onto a singular ideal with stacks. Reducing it to only 2 means more of the SA's would get used rather than all-for-one style. It's bad enough that most people here NEVER use certain SA's and will vehemently advocate against the use of certain SA's because they feel (and, they could be very right) that those SA's are essentially worthless and should be avoided. Why even have them in the game if they're so widely despised.. and so extremely un-used? Limiting the Stacking to only 2 would have builders exploring SA's they usually overlook BECAUSE they're locked into stack attack mode. So, yes... sometimes limiting one thing increases diversity.