What is the best type of linebacker to create?
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Creating a LB. What type?
Greg B
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
and no, they still can't really cover anyone running a route
This
Don't even bother looking at the Targeted/Receptions allowed stat.
and no, they still can't really cover anyone running a route
This
Don't even bother looking at the Targeted/Receptions allowed stat.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by coachingubigr
Dammit. I made a blitzer day 40.
No need to face palm that.....I prefer the blitzer arch type for every LB position except for the LOLB who covers TE and I do like the coverage LB arch type for that spot only. The Blitzer archtype has majors in speed,agility,vision, and tackling which is exactly what you want at the LB position. You don't have to blitz them just because they are a blitzer arch type
Dammit. I made a blitzer day 40.
No need to face palm that.....I prefer the blitzer arch type for every LB position except for the LOLB who covers TE and I do like the coverage LB arch type for that spot only. The Blitzer archtype has majors in speed,agility,vision, and tackling which is exactly what you want at the LB position. You don't have to blitz them just because they are a blitzer arch type
Edited by whodey08 on Nov 29, 2012 06:32:02
Originally posted by whodey08
No need to face palm that.....I prefer the blitzer arch type for every LB position except for the LOLB who covers TE and I do like the coverage LB arch type for that spot only. The Blitzer archtype has majors in speed,agility,vision, and tackling which is exactly what you want at the LB position. You don't have to blitz them just because they are a blitzer arch type
BZ LB has majors in SPD/AGL/TKL and JMP not VIS .. but its still my favourite archetype for an all around solid LB build
No need to face palm that.....I prefer the blitzer arch type for every LB position except for the LOLB who covers TE and I do like the coverage LB arch type for that spot only. The Blitzer archtype has majors in speed,agility,vision, and tackling which is exactly what you want at the LB position. You don't have to blitz them just because they are a blitzer arch type
BZ LB has majors in SPD/AGL/TKL and JMP not VIS .. but its still my favourite archetype for an all around solid LB build
Originally posted by Greg B
This
Don't even bother looking at the Targeted/Receptions allowed stat.
friends LB
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4363696&playoffs=0
This
Don't even bother looking at the Targeted/Receptions allowed stat.
friends LB
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4363696&playoffs=0
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
No need to face palm that.....I prefer the blitzer arch type for every LB position except for the LOLB who covers TE and I do like the coverage LB arch type for that spot only. The Blitzer archtype has majors in speed,agility,vision, and tackling which is exactly what you want at the LB position. You don't have to blitz them just because they are a blitzer arch type
The primary difference is the VAs. Builds will be pretty similar.
No need to face palm that.....I prefer the blitzer arch type for every LB position except for the LOLB who covers TE and I do like the coverage LB arch type for that spot only. The Blitzer archtype has majors in speed,agility,vision, and tackling which is exactly what you want at the LB position. You don't have to blitz them just because they are a blitzer arch type
The primary difference is the VAs. Builds will be pretty similar.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by oaklandraider
BZ LB has majors in SPD/AGL/TKL and JMP not VIS .. but its still my favourite archetype for an all around solid LB build
You're right. I remembered there was a reason I wanted Blitzer over coverage and it was because a blitzer has a major in tackling and coverage has a major in vision. I would rather tackling get the major ALG's for a LB and just take vision up higher skill points.
I am sure there are those that would disagree but I would rather see a LB with higher tackling than I would higher vision. Now my LB's that will be covering TE's have coverage for the higher vision but the rest of my LB's I want tackling higher.
Just my preference is all.
BZ LB has majors in SPD/AGL/TKL and JMP not VIS .. but its still my favourite archetype for an all around solid LB build
You're right. I remembered there was a reason I wanted Blitzer over coverage and it was because a blitzer has a major in tackling and coverage has a major in vision. I would rather tackling get the major ALG's for a LB and just take vision up higher skill points.
I am sure there are those that would disagree but I would rather see a LB with higher tackling than I would higher vision. Now my LB's that will be covering TE's have coverage for the higher vision but the rest of my LB's I want tackling higher.
Just my preference is all.
Edited by whodey08 on Nov 29, 2012 09:57:25
Greg B
offline
offline
Originally posted by Super Duper Cudi
friends LB
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4363696&playoffs=0
So far in 5 scrimmages my LB has given up 11 receptions allowed on 11 targets. This sim can go fuck itself tbh.
I think i'm retiring my coverage LB after this season, I'm tired of looking at borts moronic version of what receptions allowed looks like.
friends LB
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4363696&playoffs=0
So far in 5 scrimmages my LB has given up 11 receptions allowed on 11 targets. This sim can go fuck itself tbh.
I think i'm retiring my coverage LB after this season, I'm tired of looking at borts moronic version of what receptions allowed looks like.
Edited by Greg B on Nov 29, 2012 14:46:55
Blitzers are fine for MLBs, but the extra weight they carry makes them suck in coverage.
fogie55
offline
offline
Originally posted by Greg B
So far in 5 scrimmages my LB has given up 11 receptions allowed on 11 targets. This sim can go fuck itself tbh.
I think i'm retiring my coverage LB after this season, I'm tired of looking at borts moronic version of what receptions allowed looks like.
how many were screens? that's where LBs get killed in RecAllow stats. also, was the LB assigned to cover WRs? from what I understand, coverage LBs can only cover TEs and backs as they get penalized for trying to cover WRs.
So far in 5 scrimmages my LB has given up 11 receptions allowed on 11 targets. This sim can go fuck itself tbh.
I think i'm retiring my coverage LB after this season, I'm tired of looking at borts moronic version of what receptions allowed looks like.
how many were screens? that's where LBs get killed in RecAllow stats. also, was the LB assigned to cover WRs? from what I understand, coverage LBs can only cover TEs and backs as they get penalized for trying to cover WRs.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
