User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Offencive play editor
Page:
 
Bohba13
offline
Link
 
as many a suggestions have been shot down for play creators for the offense (including one of my own), I have thought of a compromise. Only being able to edit pass routes, no custom formations, no fancy running plays, and only a handful of formations that can be used. (excluded formations: Goal Line, Shot Gun 5WR, and Trips to name a few) this would make sure that we don't get exploitations that make a money play, while keeping the play usable in a GLB environment, and as the routes that are provided are already coverable by a defense, it wouldn't stack the game, only change it in a positive fashion. I don't care how gutted this is if it's implemented, because then the game will have been improved for new teams and players. and if it isn't accepted, I'll go back to the drawing board to make this better.
Edited by Bohba13 on Oct 25, 2012 17:34:25
Edited by Bohba13 on Oct 25, 2012 17:29:37
 
BagO'Chips
offline
Link
 
-1
 
SG✬21
offline
Link
 
I might take this thread more seriously if offensive was spelled right
 
Bohba13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BagO'Chips
-1


what do you suggest I should do to improve it? (no sarcasm)
 
SG✬21
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bohba13
what do you suggest I should do to improve it? (no sarcasm)


dont suggest it how about that
 
Bohba13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SG✬21
I might take this thread more seriously if offensive was spelled right


WTF SPELLCHECK! Y U NO TELL ME OFFENSIVE WAS SPELLED WRONG!
Edited by Bohba13 on Oct 25, 2012 17:40:08
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
I think it would be the next level to this game. Allow players to use concrete formations and use a standard list of routes they can select for each eligible receiver. What difference would there really be as far as how the defense would be able to react? I for one don't really see how it would hurt me as I primarily am a Defense kind of guy.

You have all the groundwork laid out already for the actual play creator. The same format of the D-Creator would work perfectly.
 
Bohba13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SG✬21
dont suggest it how about that


well Bort doesn't like an offensive play creator, yet so many in the community want one, so I'm just trying to reach the middle ground.
Edited by Bohba13 on Oct 25, 2012 17:43:00
 
BagO'Chips
offline
Link
 
Definitely not helping your chances of a plus one.
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
Finally scouting would be beyond the numbers for both sides of the ball.

Creating special routed offensive plays for formations you see your opponents defense would struggle against.

It would officially be the chess war we are all looking for.
Edited by Pwned on Oct 25, 2012 17:43:51
 
Bohba13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Pwned
Finally scouting would be beyond the numbers for both sides of the ball.

Creating special routed offensive plays for formations you see your opponents defense would struggle against.

It would officially be the chess war we are all looking for.


and the formatting should be easy enough (if not let me know) as all you need to do is isolate the data for only a select amount of routes, making it easy to make and hard to exploit.
Edited by Bohba13 on Oct 25, 2012 17:49:40
 
evileyez
Tester
offline
Link
 
as if D isn't boring enough ... giving the OCs a play creator would finally kill it.
Edited by evileyez on Oct 25, 2012 18:13:35
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by evileyez
as if D isn't boring enough ... giving the OCs a play creator would finally kill it.


As if we would know what routes they were gonna run anyways. Fuckers got minds of their own now.
 
Bohba13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
As if we would know what routes they were gonna run anyways. Fuckers got minds of their own now.


LOL!
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by evileyez
as if D isn't boring enough ... giving the OCs a play creator would finally kill it.


What?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.