If it were possible to change the number of teams per league, then there wouldn't need to be as many cpu teams, and teams that were not quite ready for the big time wouldn't have to get stuffed into elite leagues to be sacrificial lambs.
Forum > Suggestions > Is 16 teams per conferance really necessary?
beenlurken
offline
offline
I am down for fewer teams in a conference and shorter seasons.
Holy shit is it boring waiting for the playoffs.
Holy shit is it boring waiting for the playoffs.
TJ Spikes
offline
offline
Originally posted by Deathblade
Thread doesn't make sense.
reading is fundamental
===
if there's some kind of season length issue like 40 days being optimal or something, the playoffs could be adjusted to take up more days--like do double elimination or something
Thread doesn't make sense.
reading is fundamental
===
if there's some kind of season length issue like 40 days being optimal or something, the playoffs could be adjusted to take up more days--like do double elimination or something
SteveMax58
offline
offline
I'd rather see divisions at Pro and WL where you play opponents twice a season before removing teams.
But similar to the OP suggestion...the problem is really in the league sorting & placement algorithm. We keep pushing to do a re-sort for gutjobs (which helps a little) and the like when the real problem is poorly placed teams even_before_gutjobs happen.
If you solve the bad initial sorting...you'd have a viable insta-promotion process when teams do gut after the initial sort.
But similar to the OP suggestion...the problem is really in the league sorting & placement algorithm. We keep pushing to do a re-sort for gutjobs (which helps a little) and the like when the real problem is poorly placed teams even_before_gutjobs happen.
If you solve the bad initial sorting...you'd have a viable insta-promotion process when teams do gut after the initial sort.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
