I remember 1995 when 30kb x 20 images was a big deal.
It's 2012, bros.
It's 2012, bros.
Forum > Suggestions > Increase 30kb limit for avatars
I'm good with the pixel dimensions...but for animated gifs is where I was aiming
Originally posted by dusk883
I remember 1995 when 30kb x 20 images was a big deal.
It's 2012, bros.
as far as I know... 30kb is still 30kb when it comes to hosting data...
I remember 1995 when 30kb x 20 images was a big deal.
It's 2012, bros.
as far as I know... 30kb is still 30kb when it comes to hosting data...
numone
offline
offline
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
Alky
offline
offline
Originally posted by numone
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
what he said
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
what he said
spartan822
offline
offline
Originally posted by numone
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
+1
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
+1
Originally posted by Alky
Originally posted by numone
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
what he said
Originally posted by numone
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
what he said
Vortus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Myd
Things are fine as they are.
Originally posted by Greywolfmeb
This
Things are fine as they are.
Originally posted by Greywolfmeb
This
lizrdgizrd
offline
offline
Originally posted by numone
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
This.
The better suggestion imo is to no longer host the images here, instead have like imageshack or photobucket or tinypic or w/e host the images, and just link them here. then you can increase the size limit on it without wasting glb's bandwidth and it would speed up loading since it would be from a different host so the 2 pipes browsers allow to 1 host wouldn't be taken up by images.
This.
rather them make my games sim on time rather than worry about avi size and shit.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
