Knocked loose bonus only applies to WR and TE, but FBs are often used as dump off safety options for QBs. This should apply to Scat FBs too.
Forum > Suggestions > Make Possession Receiver VA apply to Scat FBs
Originally posted by tragula
The real question is why yes ?
The reason for yes is why not? As in why would a receiver who plays full back not get the same capabilities as a receiver who plays TE or WR? Its not like the receiver archtype FB is a multi role player, he is a pure receiver. So why not let him have all of the pure receiver "powers"?
For that reason
+1 to the OP.
And +1 to extending it to HBs for the same reason.
The real question is why yes ?
The reason for yes is why not? As in why would a receiver who plays full back not get the same capabilities as a receiver who plays TE or WR? Its not like the receiver archtype FB is a multi role player, he is a pure receiver. So why not let him have all of the pure receiver "powers"?
For that reason
+1 to the OP.
And +1 to extending it to HBs for the same reason.
Originally posted by yello1
The reason for yes is why not? As in why would a receiver who plays full back not get the same capabilities as a receiver who plays TE or WR? Its not like the receiver archtype FB is a multi role player, he is a pure receiver. So why not let him have all of the pure receiver "powers"?
Because VAs are specific. Why not make Mr reliable work the same on all downs ? why not make fearsome work for DL ? why not make slot machine work for TE ? .why not make GL blocker work for FB ?....
There is no need for this change. It will not contribute to the game except helping some dude crappy dots and making scatbacks (even more) overpowered.
The reason for yes is why not? As in why would a receiver who plays full back not get the same capabilities as a receiver who plays TE or WR? Its not like the receiver archtype FB is a multi role player, he is a pure receiver. So why not let him have all of the pure receiver "powers"?
Because VAs are specific. Why not make Mr reliable work the same on all downs ? why not make fearsome work for DL ? why not make slot machine work for TE ? .why not make GL blocker work for FB ?....
There is no need for this change. It will not contribute to the game except helping some dude crappy dots and making scatbacks (even more) overpowered.
Originally posted by bhall43
Naw, carrying is a major in their arch so no dice.
on top of being a .5 ALG.
Not for scat fb
AndOriginally posted by yello1
The reason for yes is why not? As in why would a receiver who plays full back not get the same capabilities as a receiver who plays TE or WR? Its not like the receiver archtype FB is a multi role player, he is a pure receiver. So why not let him have all of the pure receiver "powers"?
For that reason
+1 to the OP.
And +1 to extending it to HBs for the same reason.
They already get the power of shitty coverage mechanics against them
Naw, carrying is a major in their arch so no dice.
on top of being a .5 ALG.
Not for scat fb
AndOriginally posted by yello1
The reason for yes is why not? As in why would a receiver who plays full back not get the same capabilities as a receiver who plays TE or WR? Its not like the receiver archtype FB is a multi role player, he is a pure receiver. So why not let him have all of the pure receiver "powers"?
For that reason
+1 to the OP.
And +1 to extending it to HBs for the same reason.
They already get the power of shitty coverage mechanics against them
raiderdav
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Naw, carrying is a major in their arch so no dice.
on top of being a .5 ALG.
Not true - its a minor. And strength gets 0 ALGs so they're at a distinct disadvantage for KLs.
Naw, carrying is a major in their arch so no dice.
on top of being a .5 ALG.
Not true - its a minor. And strength gets 0 ALGs so they're at a distinct disadvantage for KLs.
bhall43
offline
offline
Huh...regardless...poss wr certainly shouldn't be added to fb and hb as almost all their routes are under 8 yards. That's fuckin retarded. Mr r serves its purpose good enough.
Originally posted by tragula
Because VAs are specific. Why not make Mr reliable work the same on all downs ? why not make fearsome work for DL ? why not make slot machine work for TE ? .why not make GL blocker work for FB ?....
There is no need for this change. It will not contribute to the game except helping some dude crappy dots and making scatbacks (even more) overpowered.
All true.
I personally am a fan of less position limitation on the SAs and VAs where the position limitation does not make sense though.
But the over powered thing is not wrong at all. I am inclined to yield the argument on that point.
Because VAs are specific. Why not make Mr reliable work the same on all downs ? why not make fearsome work for DL ? why not make slot machine work for TE ? .why not make GL blocker work for FB ?....
There is no need for this change. It will not contribute to the game except helping some dude crappy dots and making scatbacks (even more) overpowered.
All true.
I personally am a fan of less position limitation on the SAs and VAs where the position limitation does not make sense though.
But the over powered thing is not wrong at all. I am inclined to yield the argument on that point.
Originally posted by Dr. Showtime
They already get the power of shitty coverage mechanics against them
Originally posted by bhall43
Huh...regardless...poss wr certainly shouldn't be added to fb and hb as almost all their routes are under 8 yards. That's fuckin retarded. Mr r serves its purpose good enough.
True and True
I am going to withdraw my +1 here on the balance issue.
They already get the power of shitty coverage mechanics against them
Originally posted by bhall43
Huh...regardless...poss wr certainly shouldn't be added to fb and hb as almost all their routes are under 8 yards. That's fuckin retarded. Mr r serves its purpose good enough.
True and True
I am going to withdraw my +1 here on the balance issue.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
