Warrior General Games

Feel free to lock if it has already been suggested. I believe something like:

1st place - 70%
2nd place - 20%
3rd place - 10%

should be more what we are doing. To be completely honest I think the 1st place player should have a 100% chance of winning it, but that is another issue. if for whatever reason they have decided otherwise, at least make it more fair.

+1 in concept, maybe not as high as 70%

something like:
50
20
15
10
5

Idk.

So...ignore the reason it was changed in the first place?

Originally posted by Deathblade
So...ignore the reason it was changed in the first place?

lul

+1

LOL

So when did the MVP formulas start working?

Originally posted by Deathblade
So...ignore the reason it was changed in the first place?

-1 to OP. The entire purpose of changing the EQ was to discourage stat whoring one dot to the exclusion of the other 54. If the dot that wins the MVP is rewarded with the EQ 70% of the time there is no disincentive to stat whore.

Everyone should be MVP

At lease only dots on playoff teams should be MVP.

Originally posted by merenoise
If the dot that wins the MVP is rewarded with the EQ 70% of the time there is no disincentive to stat whore.

Not losing?

Originally posted by tpaterniti
Not losing?

Most of the stat whores concerned about MVPs don't care about team success.

Originally posted by All American Dude
At lease only dots on playoff teams should be MVP.

/\ -1 to OP

Originally posted by All American Dude
Most of the stat whores concerned about MVPs don't care about team success.

Exactly. They have their reward.

wat?