I know I read this in one of the threads about the returns. But, I didn't see it in any suggestions. This needs to be made available to defensive type STOP's. With all the changes it is unfair that all the O-Line STOP's now have a big advantage.
Forum > Suggestions > Add Cut Block option to all ST type players
Phantom Of The Opera
offline
offline
Originally posted by Chysil
I don't see why you shouldn't be allowed to have cut block
+1
cause they are defensive stops, not offensive stops.
-1
I don't see why you shouldn't be allowed to have cut block
+1
cause they are defensive stops, not offensive stops.
-1
mandyross
offline
offline
It's not in the SA lists?
Wouldn't that be a bug? Things like Pancake are already in there.
Wouldn't that be a bug? Things like Pancake are already in there.
alindyl
offline
offline
Yep seems like an oversight. Just test created a LB and cut block was not one of the options even when unchecking the recommended bonus SA checkbox.
Might even want to toss this into bugs in case it's unintentional. Likely no one ever looked for it before. Should probably go through and see if there are any others that might be missing.
But if they don't consider it a bug/quick fix, then +1 to have it added.
Might even want to toss this into bugs in case it's unintentional. Likely no one ever looked for it before. Should probably go through and see if there are any others that might be missing.
But if they don't consider it a bug/quick fix, then +1 to have it added.
jetsown09
offline
offline
Just letting you guys know, a cut block on a kickoff or punt is an illegal block. Therefore, -1.
/inb4 this is not real football
/inb4 this is not real football
bigtisme
offline
offline
Originally posted by jetsown09
Just letting you guys know, a cut block on a kickoff or punt is an illegal block. Therefore, -1.
This is not relevant to the suggestion.
Offensive stops currently are allowed to cut block so D dots should be too.
Just letting you guys know, a cut block on a kickoff or punt is an illegal block. Therefore, -1.
This is not relevant to the suggestion.
Offensive stops currently are allowed to cut block so D dots should be too.
jetsown09
offline
offline
Originally posted by bigtisme
This is not relevant to the suggestion.
Offensive stops currently are allowed to cut block so D dots should be too.
Why proliferate a misinterpretation of the rules? Actually, we should be getting rid of cut block for offensive STOPs instead of allowing even more dots to cut block illegally.
This is not relevant to the suggestion.
Offensive stops currently are allowed to cut block so D dots should be too.
Why proliferate a misinterpretation of the rules? Actually, we should be getting rid of cut block for offensive STOPs instead of allowing even more dots to cut block illegally.
bigtisme
offline
offline
Originally posted by jetsown09
Why proliferate a misinterpretation of the rules? Actually, we should be getting rid of cut block for offensive STOPs instead of allowing even more dots to cut block illegally.
Then go make the suggestion.
But this isn't exactly on this thread topic.
Why proliferate a misinterpretation of the rules? Actually, we should be getting rid of cut block for offensive STOPs instead of allowing even more dots to cut block illegally.
Then go make the suggestion.
But this isn't exactly on this thread topic.
bdnannac
offline
offline
Originally posted by bigtisme
This is not relevant to the suggestion.
Offensive stops currently are allowed to cut block so D dots should be too.
This.
Originally posted by jetsown09
Just letting you guys know, a cut block on a kickoff or punt is an illegal block. Therefore, -1.
/inb4 this is not real football
Then the offensive STOP's shouldn't have it if we're following your logic.
This is not relevant to the suggestion.
Offensive stops currently are allowed to cut block so D dots should be too.
This.
Originally posted by jetsown09
Just letting you guys know, a cut block on a kickoff or punt is an illegal block. Therefore, -1.
/inb4 this is not real football
Then the offensive STOP's shouldn't have it if we're following your logic.
Edited by bdnannac on Feb 21, 2012 15:31:26
Edited by bdnannac on Feb 21, 2012 15:31:01
We_Rule
offline
offline
Originally posted by bdnannac
Then the offensive STOP's shouldn't have it if we're following your logic.
Prb the best fix TBH
Then the offensive STOP's shouldn't have it if we're following your logic.
Prb the best fix TBH
bdnannac
offline
offline
Originally posted by mandyross
It's not in the SA lists?
Wouldn't that be a bug? Things like Pancake are already in there.
Well they just locked it as not a bug. What a load of crap. I can't believe I pay for this shit!
It's not in the SA lists?
Wouldn't that be a bug? Things like Pancake are already in there.
Well they just locked it as not a bug. What a load of crap. I can't believe I pay for this shit!
alindyl
offline
offline
Originally posted by bdnannac
Well they just locked it as not a bug. What a load of crap. I can't believe I pay for this shit!
No need to get bent out of shape about it. If they don't consider it a bug then continue here. It may be currently intended this way. As i said earlier, might want to check to see if there are other SA's that are not available to be taken, though they might want it that way.
Well they just locked it as not a bug. What a load of crap. I can't believe I pay for this shit!
No need to get bent out of shape about it. If they don't consider it a bug then continue here. It may be currently intended this way. As i said earlier, might want to check to see if there are other SA's that are not available to be taken, though they might want it that way.
bdnannac
offline
offline
Originally posted by alindyl
No need to get bent out of shape about it. If they don't consider it a bug then continue here. It may be currently intended this way. As i said earlier, might want to check to see if there are other SA's that are not available to be taken, though they might want it that way.
Reason I'm getting bent out of shape is because if you don't cry over and over in main forums it's almost impossible to get something done.
No need to get bent out of shape about it. If they don't consider it a bug then continue here. It may be currently intended this way. As i said earlier, might want to check to see if there are other SA's that are not available to be taken, though they might want it that way.
Reason I'm getting bent out of shape is because if you don't cry over and over in main forums it's almost impossible to get something done.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
