User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Owner Trophy
Page:
 
VegasABD
offline
Link
 
Why does one say owner and the other say co-owner? Shouldn't they both say Co-Owner, if a team is Co-Owned?
Edited by VegasABD on Feb 9, 2012 17:36:00
 
alindyl
offline
Link
 
One person pays the bills, the other person doesn't.

-1
 
Greywolfmeb
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by alindyl
One person pays the bills, the other person doesn't.

-1


 
VegasABD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by alindyl
One person pays the bills, the other person doesn't.

-1


If you are a douche then that is how it works....CO, means 2 so a real co-owner would send flex to the other co-owner....So how about this...Bort could research to see if it has been done, and then call both CO-OWNER....Otherwise call one owner, and the other a Packer fan with a useless piece of paper.
 
PatrickStump
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by VegasABD
If you are a douche then that is how it works....CO, means 2 so a real co-owner would send flex to the other co-owner....So how about this...Bort could research to see if it has been done, and then call both CO-OWNER....Otherwise call one owner, and the other a Packer fan with a useless piece of paper.


http://jetsrant.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/U-MAD-BRO.jpg
 
tuba_samurai
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by VegasABD
Why does one say owner and the other say co-owner? Shouldn't they both say Co-Owner, if a team is Co-Owned?


No. The Trophy reflects the position held. Ultimately the owner is is total control of the team, so they deserve to be recognized in that light.
 
TaySC
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Greywolfmeb
Originally posted by alindyl

One person pays the bills, the other person doesn't.

-1




 
Ken1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TaySC
Originally posted by Greywolfmeb

Originally posted by alindyl


One person pays the bills, the other person doesn't.

-1






 
MC_Hammer
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by VegasABD
Originally posted by alindyl

One person pays the bills, the other person doesn't.

-1


If you are a douche then that is how it works....CO, means 2 so a real co-owner would send flex to the other co-owner....


So you are saying that is how it works for you then, correct?
Flex transfers are not allowed. The closest thing that is allowed is donated flex for scrims. You have been playing long enough to know this already.
 
VegasABD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MC_Hammer
So you are saying that is how it works for you then, correct?
Flex transfers are not allowed. The closest thing that is allowed is donated flex for scrims. You have been playing long enough to know this already.


So I send the team flex and the owner uses them on scrims....Doesn't that save him flex for other things????? You have been playing long enough to understand 2+2=4
 
PatrickStump
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by VegasABD
So I send the team flex and the owner uses them on scrims....Doesn't that save him flex for other things????? You have been playing long enough to understand 2+2=4


CMN
 
hatchman
Goat Father
offline
Link
 
Not being argumentative but alot of people add money to teams flex funds that aren't co-owners. yes it does lessen the cost the owner spends on scrimmages. but essentially it doesn't help pay for the team.
 
vinman
offline
Link
 
lol -1
 
MC_Hammer
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by VegasABD
Originally posted by MC_Hammer

So you are saying that is how it works for you then, correct?
Flex transfers are not allowed. The closest thing that is allowed is donated flex for scrims. You have been playing long enough to know this already.


So I send the team flex and the owner uses them on scrims....Doesn't that save him flex for other things????? You have been playing long enough to understand 2+2=4


you can't send the OWNER flex.... only the team.
Apples and oranges.
 
Kelts
offline
Link
 
51% owner 49% co-owner
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.