Warrior General Games

Not sure if this is even worth the idea, but what about allowing us to be able to franchise one player per team. This would be for a minimal number of seasons, 3 maybe 4, and maybe at max salary. Also, an owner of a team with a franchise player would not be able to cut or trade the player.

To franchise a player, it would cost both owner and agent flex points after both accept, similar to accepting a friendly scrimmage. The trade offs would be that each player would get a bonus of some sorts, as long as his agent is not an owner or manager of said team. Again, there will never be a franchise player on the same team as the owners/managers, that would be a red flag for bad things.

Did not want to suggest what kind of bonus, but that can be up for discussion.

NGTH

If this is the franchise tag like in the NFL (where the team forces the player to stay on the team) then it would be NGTH

Any kind of bonus would probably be NGTH because it's a rich get richer type thing (buying bonuses with flex points more so than normal etc)

if this didn't have any kind of bonuses it'd probably be pretty pointless, since why would you spend flex on a contract when you could just get the contract anyways?

sighs... sometimes I think I am speaking jibberish

1. Franchise would mean an extended contract offer beyond the normal 3 years which would guarantee the player has a team for that time, in exchange they would get some sort of equipment bonus. But I think this is where I will stop, as I am coming to realize suggestions are not really that useful other than minor changes. And the NGTH means it would change the game.

The rich get richer? Please explain and with comparison to what was stated in the initial post. Who said anything about buying bonuses with flex points?

Are you meaning that some teams that do not have flex points would suffer? If that's it, then I think I am getting why the NGTH would be on this. So maybe not flex points but something that would, oh nevermind getting tired of typing.
Feels foolish for even bothering adding some of these suggestions, the game is good as is.

I don't see this as something that is needed or really wanted. It would just be a easy way for someone to get a player on their team a added bonus in EQ. so I think this will fall under the rich getting richer thing and is NGTH.

and before I get bashed for my statement look at me personally I own every dot on my team and I could essentially name 1 of my players the franchise player and do it just to get the EQ bonus mentioned. so this idea is something that would help me. but it is also a idea that could essentially give me a unfair advantage over someone else. so personally I do not want the idea implemented. If I can't win without the little extra help I need to go back and work harder on my team and the coordinating.

Not needed. -1

not necessary -1

-1

-1

i cant think of any words to say how bad this would be so ill use -1

-1 glb has soo many more thing sto fix yet they say there outta beta????