Would love to be able to own 4 casual teams. I understand that alot of people dont want to see more teams but at the same time i can fill my teams up. i am not asking for the 9 max teams per person owned to move up..9 teams is kind of crazy to begin with. just want to own 4 casual teams..
Forum > Suggestions > Casual League team ownership bumped from 3 max to 4
Steelernutt68
offline
offline
Originally posted by Myd
I could support the idea of the 9 team limit being a little more mix-and-match. Maybe not allow all of one type but some lesser options. I would say modify it a limit of 8 teams per agent with no more than 4 or 5 per league type.
yep, thats what i am thinking as well would be a good idea.. i love this game and with 6 kids its just easier to do tactics etc with casual teams for me. i know AIs as well, but alittle too much for me on a regular basis.
I could support the idea of the 9 team limit being a little more mix-and-match. Maybe not allow all of one type but some lesser options. I would say modify it a limit of 8 teams per agent with no more than 4 or 5 per league type.
yep, thats what i am thinking as well would be a good idea.. i love this game and with 6 kids its just easier to do tactics etc with casual teams for me. i know AIs as well, but alittle too much for me on a regular basis.
Originally posted by Steelernutt68
Would love to be able to own 4 casual teams. I understand that alot of people dont want to see more teams but at the same time i can fill my teams up. i am not asking for the 9 max teams per person owned to move up..9 teams is kind of crazy to begin with. just want to own 4 casual teams..
I can fully understand what you are saying here steelernutt and I agree you could fill your team. but if GLB allowed this then that would water down even more of the player pool to some extent. you are like me we build a ton of dots for our own teams. so we don't have to recruit as many agents to play on our teams. but lets say for example GLB allowed this then owners like Yello1 would buy another team and he would not be able to fill it. so then we would have to listen to more of his rants about the game not being any fun or the game being unfair to him.
again my friend I know you could fill a team but a huge % of people that would buy the teams wouldn't be able to fill the teams. and this would essentially hurt the casual game in 2 ways. 1.) it would further dilute the player pool and 2) it would hurt the competitiveness of even more leagues.
Would love to be able to own 4 casual teams. I understand that alot of people dont want to see more teams but at the same time i can fill my teams up. i am not asking for the 9 max teams per person owned to move up..9 teams is kind of crazy to begin with. just want to own 4 casual teams..
I can fully understand what you are saying here steelernutt and I agree you could fill your team. but if GLB allowed this then that would water down even more of the player pool to some extent. you are like me we build a ton of dots for our own teams. so we don't have to recruit as many agents to play on our teams. but lets say for example GLB allowed this then owners like Yello1 would buy another team and he would not be able to fill it. so then we would have to listen to more of his rants about the game not being any fun or the game being unfair to him.
again my friend I know you could fill a team but a huge % of people that would buy the teams wouldn't be able to fill the teams. and this would essentially hurt the casual game in 2 ways. 1.) it would further dilute the player pool and 2) it would hurt the competitiveness of even more leagues.
Kirghiz
offline
offline
Originally posted by Myd
I could support the idea of the 9 team limit being a little more mix-and-match. Maybe not allow all of one type but some lesser options. I would say modify it a limit of 8 teams per agent with no more than 4 or 5 per league type.
Or even cap it at 6 total, but they can be any type.
People that play Pee Wee competitively don't really get into other leagues, many casual players have no interest in playing regular, and many regular players have no interest in playing casual. It would reduce the number of teams to some extent, which the game needs, but it would also give people more freedom to play how they want. Also, a cap of six teams is enough to keep a team at the top constantly of that is what the agent's goal is.
I could support the idea of the 9 team limit being a little more mix-and-match. Maybe not allow all of one type but some lesser options. I would say modify it a limit of 8 teams per agent with no more than 4 or 5 per league type.
Or even cap it at 6 total, but they can be any type.
People that play Pee Wee competitively don't really get into other leagues, many casual players have no interest in playing regular, and many regular players have no interest in playing casual. It would reduce the number of teams to some extent, which the game needs, but it would also give people more freedom to play how they want. Also, a cap of six teams is enough to keep a team at the top constantly of that is what the agent's goal is.
Originally posted by Kirghiz
Or even cap it at 6 total, but they can be any type.
People that play Pee Wee competitively don't really get into other leagues, many casual players have no interest in playing regular, and many regular players have no interest in playing casual. It would reduce the number of teams to some extent, which the game needs, but it would also give people more freedom to play how they want. Also, a cap of six teams is enough to keep a team at the top constantly of that is what the agent's goal is.
If it were to drop the number of teams from 9 to 6 then I could get behind the suggestion. I think GLB needs to really cut out some leagues and go back to the waiting list to be a team owner. there used to be plenty of players to fill teams now agents buy teams on day -3 and there aren't enough players in the marketplace to fill half a team.
Or even cap it at 6 total, but they can be any type.
People that play Pee Wee competitively don't really get into other leagues, many casual players have no interest in playing regular, and many regular players have no interest in playing casual. It would reduce the number of teams to some extent, which the game needs, but it would also give people more freedom to play how they want. Also, a cap of six teams is enough to keep a team at the top constantly of that is what the agent's goal is.
If it were to drop the number of teams from 9 to 6 then I could get behind the suggestion. I think GLB needs to really cut out some leagues and go back to the waiting list to be a team owner. there used to be plenty of players to fill teams now agents buy teams on day -3 and there aren't enough players in the marketplace to fill half a team.
Steelernutt68
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by Steelernutt68
Would love to be able to own 4 casual teams. I understand that alot of people dont want to see more teams but at the same time i can fill my teams up. i am not asking for the 9 max teams per person owned to move up..9 teams is kind of crazy to begin with. just want to own 4 casual teams..
I can fully understand what you are saying here steelernutt and I agree you could fill your team. but if GLB allowed this then that would water down even more of the player pool to some extent. you are like me we build a ton of dots for our own teams. so we don't have to recruit as many agents to play on our teams. but lets say for example GLB allowed this then owners like Yello1 would buy another team and he would not be able to fill it. so then we would have to listen to more of his rants about the game not being any fun or the game being unfair to him.
again my friend I know you could fill a team but a huge % of people that would buy the teams wouldn't be able to fill the teams. and this would essentially hurt the casual game in 2 ways. 1.) it would further dilute the player pool and 2) it would hurt the competitiveness of even more leagues.
i understand where youre coming from believe me. and youre right about the watering down thing..sad thing is its so hard to find owners i like playing for. too many newb owners who autofill thier teams so a person who can build good dots doesnt want to waste thier time playing for them.
hows this for a potential idea?
Make it to where you have to own 3 casual teams/or regular for a specific amount of time..then you have to apply to be approved for a 4th team..that would keep the people who shouldnt own a team from owning too many..just an idea.
Originally posted by Steelernutt68
Would love to be able to own 4 casual teams. I understand that alot of people dont want to see more teams but at the same time i can fill my teams up. i am not asking for the 9 max teams per person owned to move up..9 teams is kind of crazy to begin with. just want to own 4 casual teams..
I can fully understand what you are saying here steelernutt and I agree you could fill your team. but if GLB allowed this then that would water down even more of the player pool to some extent. you are like me we build a ton of dots for our own teams. so we don't have to recruit as many agents to play on our teams. but lets say for example GLB allowed this then owners like Yello1 would buy another team and he would not be able to fill it. so then we would have to listen to more of his rants about the game not being any fun or the game being unfair to him.
again my friend I know you could fill a team but a huge % of people that would buy the teams wouldn't be able to fill the teams. and this would essentially hurt the casual game in 2 ways. 1.) it would further dilute the player pool and 2) it would hurt the competitiveness of even more leagues.
i understand where youre coming from believe me. and youre right about the watering down thing..sad thing is its so hard to find owners i like playing for. too many newb owners who autofill thier teams so a person who can build good dots doesnt want to waste thier time playing for them.
hows this for a potential idea?
Make it to where you have to own 3 casual teams/or regular for a specific amount of time..then you have to apply to be approved for a 4th team..that would keep the people who shouldnt own a team from owning too many..just an idea.
Kirghiz
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
Do we really want yello to own four casual teams?
It'd be better than 3 pro teams.
Do we really want yello to own four casual teams?
It'd be better than 3 pro teams.
Steelernutt68
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
Do we really want yello to own four casual teams?
they should just allow owner to apply for a 4th team. only proven owners who use thier teams actively can be granted a 4th upon approval of course. and make it where you have to have 3 active teams for 3-4 seasons prior to applying.
Do we really want yello to own four casual teams?
they should just allow owner to apply for a 4th team. only proven owners who use thier teams actively can be granted a 4th upon approval of course. and make it where you have to have 3 active teams for 3-4 seasons prior to applying.
Originally posted by Steelernutt68
they should just allow owner to apply for a 4th team. only proven owners who use thier teams actively can be granted a 4th upon approval of course. and make it where you have to have 3 active teams for 3-4 seasons prior to applying.
I could get behind that idea to a extent but it still waters down the player pool for other users. that basically already can't fill teams except with autofill.
seriously steelernutt I am completely agreeing with you but I am also trying to look at it from the owners that have a hard time filling teams. If GLB cut the number of teams that can be owned down to 6 and they cut a few leagues out so that the player pool wasn't so watered down. then I could see the possibility of a owner that has had 3 casual or 3 regular teams putting in a request to support to own another team in that facet of the game.
But until something is done to combat the diluted player pool I still can't agree with doing this now. and before anyone says I am just saying no for my own benefit this doesn't affect me at all. I own every player on my 1 team. the other team I own is used to let a few agents learn how to coordinate. so I autofill that team just to let people build players and use the team to work on coordinating.
they should just allow owner to apply for a 4th team. only proven owners who use thier teams actively can be granted a 4th upon approval of course. and make it where you have to have 3 active teams for 3-4 seasons prior to applying.
I could get behind that idea to a extent but it still waters down the player pool for other users. that basically already can't fill teams except with autofill.
seriously steelernutt I am completely agreeing with you but I am also trying to look at it from the owners that have a hard time filling teams. If GLB cut the number of teams that can be owned down to 6 and they cut a few leagues out so that the player pool wasn't so watered down. then I could see the possibility of a owner that has had 3 casual or 3 regular teams putting in a request to support to own another team in that facet of the game.
But until something is done to combat the diluted player pool I still can't agree with doing this now. and before anyone says I am just saying no for my own benefit this doesn't affect me at all. I own every player on my 1 team. the other team I own is used to let a few agents learn how to coordinate. so I autofill that team just to let people build players and use the team to work on coordinating.
Steelernutt68
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by Steelernutt68
they should just allow owner to apply for a 4th team. only proven owners who use thier teams actively can be granted a 4th upon approval of course. and make it where you have to have 3 active teams for 3-4 seasons prior to applying.
I could get behind that idea to a extent but it still waters down the player pool for other users. that basically already can't fill teams except with autofill.
seriously steelernutt I am completely agreeing with you but I am also trying to look at it from the owners that have a hard time filling teams. If GLB cut the number of teams that can be owned down to 6 and they cut a few leagues out so that the player pool wasn't so watered down. then I could see the possibility of a owner that has had 3 casual or 3 regular teams putting in a request to support to own another team in that facet of the game.
But until something is done to combat the diluted player pool I still can't agree with doing this now. and before anyone says I am just saying no for my own benefit this doesn't affect me at all. I own every player on my 1 team. the other team I own is used to let a few agents learn how to coordinate. so I autofill that team just to let people build players and use the team to work on coordinating.
i hear you. i will probaly just buy a regular team so i can put my other dots on. this was just wishful thinking i know. i usually wont join a team unless i have some power in helping running it.
Originally posted by Steelernutt68
they should just allow owner to apply for a 4th team. only proven owners who use thier teams actively can be granted a 4th upon approval of course. and make it where you have to have 3 active teams for 3-4 seasons prior to applying.
I could get behind that idea to a extent but it still waters down the player pool for other users. that basically already can't fill teams except with autofill.
seriously steelernutt I am completely agreeing with you but I am also trying to look at it from the owners that have a hard time filling teams. If GLB cut the number of teams that can be owned down to 6 and they cut a few leagues out so that the player pool wasn't so watered down. then I could see the possibility of a owner that has had 3 casual or 3 regular teams putting in a request to support to own another team in that facet of the game.
But until something is done to combat the diluted player pool I still can't agree with doing this now. and before anyone says I am just saying no for my own benefit this doesn't affect me at all. I own every player on my 1 team. the other team I own is used to let a few agents learn how to coordinate. so I autofill that team just to let people build players and use the team to work on coordinating.
i hear you. i will probaly just buy a regular team so i can put my other dots on. this was just wishful thinking i know. i usually wont join a team unless i have some power in helping running it.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
