Warrior General Games

I'm pretty sure this is on the NGTH list but, could we have 1 player where we can have him level up to level 79 right away. You can build him through something liek the VPB, then with the BT's then you buy AEQ after he is created and level 79.
Added Suggestions
players would begin in plateau, moving much faster to aging, retirement, and 30% of flex costs profiting the site.

But it should be limited to one such player per agent

I personally do not like the idea. alot of people may but for me personally I like the journey of building players. and not everything is about getting to level 79 and the WL. or atleast not to everyone.

+1

Who gives a crap about LOLminors.

Originally posted by The Avenger
+1

Who gives a crap about LOLminors.


I just think this would be neat. Especialy for some of the new guys who want to feel what it is liek to have a plyer int he Pro'zzz

Originally posted by The Avenger
+1

Who gives a crap about LOLminors.

that is your opinion and you are entitled to it. just like everyone else is entitled to theres.

Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by The Avenger

+1

Who gives a crap about LOLminors.

that is your opinion and you are entitled to it. just like everyone else is entitled to theres.

And you're entitled to yours.

I'd find this to be fun...and it would make the site money as such players would begin in plateau, moving much faster to aging, retirement, and 30% of flex costs profiting the site.

But it should be limited to one such player per agent, as the OP suggested.

There is no VPB.

Bort himself floated the idea of having players that would begin at level 40. This was before the acceleration of player building and the changes to offseason training; with the stabilization of both XP and TP, there's really no reason to not do it aside from not having an official virtual player builder. Say you wanted to build an 80-day-old DT. You'd still pay the starting (200) and boosting (600 [3 boosts] x 3 opportunities), but instead of enjoying those two seasons of development on the field, he'd bypass those. Same cost, same return. Hell, that would help fill a LOT of recruiting holes.

-1 to the OP, only because it's too narrow.

Not a big fan of this myself, I could see why people may like it but I could also see ways for it to be exploited.

+1 if it's only one dot.

Originally posted by -Achanceb4-

I just think this would be neat. Especialy for some of the new guys who want to feel what it is liek to have a plyer int he Pro'zzz

Not so sure there's any appeal to a "new guy" to spend 3100/6200/9300 flex up front on one player, especially to find out that 48s across the board with everything else in SAs doesn't really work.

-1 why play?

Originally posted by CDZYO
There is no VPB.



Yes there is & use it all the time. http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/107902

Originally posted by hatchman
I personally do not like the idea. alot of people may but for me personally I like the journey of building players. and not everything is about getting to level 79 and the WL. or atleast not to everyone.

You're right, everything is not, but alot of peopel think the funnest part of building a dot is when they get older.

Originally posted by txrulz
Yes there is & use it all the time. http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/107902
That's a Greasemonkey script -- it's not an official/authorized/supported/whatever part of the game.

Originally posted by -Achanceb4-
But it should be limited to one such player per agent
Why?