User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
As some of you might have seen Satchmoa-n-Dizzy put together a spreadsheet that calculates the projected standing based on the games already played. I did run the numbers ofr WEPL, and here is what it looks like after week 7:

Rk__Team_________________W___L___T____%_____PF____PA__
..1 . . Berlin Blitzkrieg...... . . . . . . 15 . . ..1 . . 0 . . 94% . . 561 . . 183
..2 . . Lake Charles Who Dats . . . . 14 . . ..2 . . 0 . . 88% . . 553 . . 210
..3 . . Aberdeen Wrecking Crew . . . . . . . . . . 14 . . ..2 . . 0 . . 88% . . 433 . . 166
..4 . . Woodridge Lumberjacks. . . 13 . . ..3 . . 0 . . 81% . . 585 . . 240
..5 . . London Monarchs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . ..5 . . 0 . . 69% . . 456 . . 241
..6 . . E-City Mercenaries. . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . ..6 . . 0 . . 63% . . 485 . . 257
..7 . . Wembley Warriors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . ..6 . . 0 . . 63% . . 377 . . 228
..8 . . Valhalla Vikings. . . . . . . . . ..9 . . ..7 . . 0 . . 56% . . 529 . . 259
..9 . . Fightin' Texas Aggies . . . . . . . . . ..8 . . ..8 . . 0 . . 50% . . 384 . . 289
10 . . Copenhagen Dragons . ..6 . . 10 . . 0 . . 38% . . 259 . . 365
11 . . Nice Dauphins . . . . . . ..5 . . 11 . . 0 . . 31% . . 269 . . 392
12 . . Stuttgart Nighthawks . . . . . . . ..5 . . 11 . . 0 . . 31% . . 252 . . 310
13 . . Lyon Sharks. . . . . . . . . . . ..4 . . 12 . . 0 . . 25% . . 301 . . 632
14 . . Glastonbury Knights . . . . . ..2 . . 14 . . 0 . . 13% . . 134 . . 637
15 . . Blackpool Mountain Lions . . . . . . ..1 . . 15 . . 0 . . ..6% . . ..78 . . 580
16 . . Paris-Asnieres Molosses. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..0 . . 16 . . 0 . . ..0% . . ..35 . . 667



Rk__Team_________________W___L___T____%_____PF____PA__
..1 . . Rohrheim Stampede. . . . . . . . . . . . 16 . . ..0 . . 0 . . 100% . . ...621 . . ...104
..2 . . Reykjavik Aggies. . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 . . ..1 . . 0 . . ..94% . . ...794 . . .....88
..3 . . Frankfurt HEAT . . . . . . . . . . 13 . . ..3 . . 0 . . ..81% . . 1125,867 . . ...159
..4 . . Valencia Billy Goats . . . . . . . . . . . 12 . . ..4 . . 0 . . ..75% . . ...641 . . ...228
..5 . . Korb Destroyers. . 12 . . ..4 . . 0 . . ..75% . . ...783 . . ...206
..6 . . MA Trolls. . . . . . . . 11 . . ..5 . . 0 . . ..69% . . 1099,431 . . ...185
..7 . . Oslo Berserkers. . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . ..6 . . 0 . . ..63% . . ...520 . . ...229
..8 . . Paris Musketeers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..9 . . ..7 . . 0 . . ..56% . . ...504 . . ...204
..9 . . Oxford Eagles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..8 . . ..8 . . 0 . . ..50% . . ...579 . . ...429
10 . . Rotterdam Roughnecks. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..8 . . ..8 . . 0 . . ..50% . . ...978 . . ...276
11 . . Multiple Scorgasms. . . . . . . . . . . ..5 . . 11 . . 0 . . ..31% . . ...324 . . ...304
12 . . Bari Barracudas . . . . . . ..4 . . 12 . . 0 . . ..25% . . ...315 . . ...674
13 . . Dfools AllStars . . . . . . . . . . . . ..3 . . 13 . . 0 . . ..19% . . ...221 . . ...624
14 . . Sandford, Gloucestershire Policeman Officers. . . . . . . ..3 . . 13 . . 0 . . ..19% . . ...163 . . ...497
15 . . SOUTH TEXAS TIGERS. . . . . . . . . ..1 . . 15 . . 0 . . ....6% . . .....48 . . 1550,323
16 . . Helsinki Horned Frogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..0 . . 16 . . 0 . . ....0% . . .....41 . . 3581,250
Last edited Jun 26, 2008 16:07:29
 
ScudRunner
offline
Link
 
What's up with the rankings? How is Wembley in 9th place at 10-6 with the 8th palce team at 8-8?
 
jprietman
offline
Link
 
what do the last two numbers mean?
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
As the headline says, these are the projected standings based on the currently played games.

And the last two numbers are projected points for and against.
 
ScudRunner
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Zickzack
As the headline says, these are the projected standings based on the currently played games.


Yeah, I get that. But how does a team get to be projected in ninth place with a projected record of 10-6 behind a team with a projected record of 8-8? Or for that matter how does a team get to be projected in second place with a projected record of 15-1 behind a team with a projected record of 13-3?

I just don't get where the rankings are coming from in Alpha Conference, that's all. They make sense for Zeta.

Last edited Jun 26, 2008 16:03:48
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
Good point, I did not actually look at the projected records yet, no idea why it messes up the order in Alpha, maybe I'll look into the formulas when I find some time for it.


Edit: Nevermind, found it, you can sort by different categories, and I had done a sort by points scored, it's corrected now.
Last edited Jun 26, 2008 16:08:01
 
brock86
offline
Link
 
1.5 MILLION points against South Texas? I know they're not doing too well, but that seems a bit harsh.

Even more lol-worthy, Woo Jacks at #4??

Thanks for running the numbers. Will be fun to compare with the actual results at the end of the season.
 
irish1611
offline
Link
 
I hope that is how it works out
 
Hampe
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Zickzack
.....it's corrected now.

Ahaaa....I wondered why I had no clue what scudrunner was talking about.
Last edited Jun 26, 2008 17:01:24
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by brock86
1.5 MILLION points against South Texas?

As I did the numbers on a european PC and copied from there I am almost certain that it is one thousand five hundred and some. No idea though where the fractions would come from, but I guess in those ranges the numbers get shady anyway.

 
helluin
offline
Link
 
Heh, I wouldn't bet on those numbers =p
 
ScudRunner
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Zickzack
Good point, I did not actually look at the projected records yet, no idea why it messes up the order in Alpha, maybe I'll look into the formulas when I find some time for it.


Edit: Nevermind, found it, you can sort by different categories, and I had done a sort by points scored, it's corrected now.


It's cool. I was just messing with you a little bit, since we're squaring off against each other tomorrow. YOU'RE GOING DOWN!

 
Mike Rogers
Lead Tester
offline
Link
 

Same as any rankings system thats not the actualy Standings...

This will be prtty silly until about Game 12... when everything is almost balanced out.

But Week 14 and 15 I think something like 80% success is possible, with scores with a 10 point range?

Will be good to see it this season, though.
 
Mike Rogers
Lead Tester
offline
Link
 
double post
Last edited Jun 26, 2008 21:58:47
 
kongemeier
offline
Link
 
Oh, that puts the Musketeers in the playoffs! I hope this is accurate Would love to have a shot at Rohrheim!
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.