Warrior General Games

strength : 97.57
speed : 91.79 (+49) = 140.79
agility : 97.1 (+6) = 103.1
jumping : 30.26
stamina : 62.79
vision : 78.1
confidence : 50.26
tackling : 90.57

0/0/0/0/0
3/5/9/1/1

1 MT%, 1 BB%, 1 FF%, CEQ in BB%,

bull rusher, tech man, heavyweight, JTS, power tackler,

or put all equipment in speed to end up at 146 speed 97 agility and go pocket crusher instead of tech man.

Possibly go with FS instead of shed block?

Whoa. I'd definitely go with First Step, but I'm not sure if I'd rather use that dot as a blitzing LOLB or a crazy hard-hitting LB who plays off the line of scrimmage.

Interesting. Feels like a cross between my cover and hard hitters. Awesome.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Whoa. I'd definitely go with First Step, but I'm not sure if I'd rather use that dot as a blitzing LOLB or a crazy hard-hitting LB who plays off the line of scrimmage.

I wouldn't blitz him at all. I'd move him back and have him tackle everybody.

I was thinking ROLB in a 3-4 with a strong side line shift and weak side LB shift and ROLB set to shallow. Then play him like one of the old speed DEs.

its like a speed DE at LB i like it

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
strength : 97.57
speed : 91.79 (+49) = 140.79
agility : 97.1 (+6) = 103.1
jumping : 30.26
stamina : 62.79
vision : 78.1
confidence : 50.26
tackling : 90.57

0/0/0/0/0
3/5/9/1/1

1 MT%, 1 BB%, 1 FF%, CEQ in BB%,

bull rusher, tech man, heavyweight, JTS, power tackler,

or put all equipment in speed to end up at 146 speed 97 agility and go pocket crusher instead of tech man.

Possibly go with FS instead of shed block?

Wow, I got close to that, but my tackle and vision ended a bit lower. damn you rage. JD said he would definitely go with FS instead of Shed Block. I had thought I would go the other route though. I suppose JD may have me thinking the other way now. Now if only I can actually get this guy build though, but also want to see where I went wrong to fall a bit short of what I am seeing here. Guess test and revise for me.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
I was thinking ROLB in a 3-4 with a strong side line shift and weak side LB shift and ROLB set to shallow. Then play him like one of the old speed DEs.
I like that idea too.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
I was thinking ROLB in a 3-4 with a strong side line shift and weak side LB shift and ROLB set to shallow. Then play him like one of the old speed DEs.

The problem with that is that he is in the rolb spot always...

What you could do if you have a separate blitzer is have a rolb 1 and a rolb and have him set as the only rolb but use a lot of nickel etc

Originally posted by toobad4u_00
Wow, I got close to that, but my tackle and vision ended a bit lower. damn you rage. JD said he would definitely go with FS instead of Shed Block. I had thought I would go the other route though. I suppose JD may have me thinking the other way now. Now if only I can actually get this guy build though, but also want to see where I went wrong to fall a bit short of what I am seeing here. Guess test and revise for me.

Mine is one already in the process. So he has had some breakthroughs in training already, and had some longer seasons as well. Then there is the fact that I found a couple of +5% pieces from shopping which lets me quad train longer than if you are trying to get enough BT starting from scratch.

Rages' maths are so good.

with a couple cans of red bull and the VPB i'm pretty sure rage could fix the economy

Originally posted by iosif
with a couple cans of red bull and the VPB i'm pretty sure rage could fix the economy

Simple. Republicans take Obama's jobs bill, and agree to pass it as long as we open up more drilling for oil and natural gas and approve more mining for coal and shale.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
Simple. Republicans take Obama's jobs bill, and agree to pass it as long as we open up more drilling for oil and natural gas and approve more mining for coal and shale.

see, didn't even need the red bull.