User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
toobad4u_00
offline
Link
 
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2360362

I realize his speed is probably a little low in most opinions for an elusive back. Any other criticisms you guys have?

Also, a question about % equipment here. Would BT% really be all that effective or would Fake% Eq be more beneficial?
Edited by toobad4u_00 on Sep 23, 2011 07:34:09
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
I wouldn't have capped vision & confidence already. Continue to work on carrying for now, plan to eventually have stamina in the 60s, and include catching in your multi-training. As for the type of AEQ, that depends on what SAs and attributes you end up with. Ask again in two seasons.
 
toobad4u_00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
I wouldn't have capped vision & confidence already. Continue to work on carrying for now, plan to eventually have stamina in the 60s, and include catching in your multi-training. As for the type of AEQ, that depends on what SAs and attributes you end up with. Ask again in two seasons.


My eventual build will easily get to 60+ on stamina... I planned on getting catching involved at some point, still haven't decided for sure when, because I am not sure how high I want that to go yet. I made a bad business decision on confidence and vision I believe and started out with training those in my multitraining and thus capped those a bit early to be able to move on to something else (probably another bad business decision, but I can't go back on either of those decisions now ).

I have gambled a juke and a spin piece on AEQ so far that I took. I normally don't spin for the 3rd one but I went one more time. I have the option of a 2nd spin piece, which I suppose I could take and then use my CEQ for a Fake% piece was my thought. Would that be a 3rd really bad business move though?
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Don't ever get two pieces of AEQ in the same SA. Just not efficient.
 
toobad4u_00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Don't ever get two pieces of AEQ in the same SA. Just not efficient.


Diminishing results in SAs as well. Check. And thank you very much for your input jd.
Edited by toobad4u_00 on Sep 23, 2011 10:32:00
 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by toobad4u_00
Diminishing results in SAs as well. Check. And thank you very much for your input jd.


It has nothing to do with diminishing returns, well not much. You can get a AEQ piece up to +6 SA. Along with custom +1 you are at +7.

If you want to get to +11 that is 6 SP, or one boost. Very good ROI.
 
toobad4u_00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
It has nothing to do with diminishing returns, well not much. You can get a AEQ piece up to +6 SA. Along with custom +1 you are at +7.

If you want to get to +11 that is 6 SP, or one boost. Very good ROI.


So what is wrong with 17 with 2 pieces and 6 SP. Is it because of Diminishing returns that it does not work, or does it not allow for that for some reason in the sim... either case would be a form of diminishing the returns of the piece.
 
GosuPho
offline
Link
 
Let's say the difference between 7 and 10 is greater than the difference between 11 and 17
 
toobad4u_00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DCocoSD
Let's say the difference between 7 and 10 is greater than the difference between 11 and 17


Which is to say the results diminish.
 
GosuPho
offline
Link
 
yes, the rule of thumb is that 12 is probably the max you should go before it's just wasting points that could go to a different skill
 
toobad4u_00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DCocoSD
yes, the rule of thumb is that 12 is probably the max you should go before it's just wasting points that could go to a different skill


Thank you, I was thinking I must have turned stupid and forgotten the meaning of diminishing results. That would be bad for someone in my field.


Edits.. being funny I suppose... if u can call stupid funny.
Edited by toobad4u_00 on Sep 23, 2011 12:23:18
Edited by toobad4u_00 on Sep 23, 2011 12:22:36
 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by toobad4u_00
Thank you, I was thinking I must have turned stupid and forgotten the meaning of diminishing results. That would be bad for someone in my field.


Edits.. being funny I suppose... if u can call stupid funny.


Did you even read my post?
 
toobad4u_00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
Did you even read my post?


Umm yes, did you read any of mine?
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.