Warrior General Games

I have been thinking about Gart's idea and I think it can work really well. Here is how I envision it working:

So we get the 3 WL reps for each region plus as many teams from OPL and CPL that want to participate (numbers have to be equal).

Then each region seeds its teams. The beauty of the top 9 games being weighted is you have to have your best teams ranked higher, no benefit in trying to rig the rankings. The top 9 games have special value:

#1 seeds game = 10 points
#2 seeds game = 9 points
#3 seeds game = 8 points
#4 seeds game = 7 points
#5 seeds game = 6 points
#6 seeds game = 5 points
#7 seeds game = 4 points
#8 seeds game = 3 points
#9 seeds game = 2 points
#10 seeds game = 1 point
All other seeds game = 1 point

That will give special meaning to the top games but allow as many teams that like (even the all CPU player teams) to participate.

Thoughts?

Sounds great

count us in

Devonport is in.

Although with all the smack talk going on, there really needs to be an avatar bet or something involved.

excellent IDEAR

EAG is in if we can use the league game to count

All day long.

Can Central be in this one? The Oberon game was only that ad because I made a mistake on the AI and we only used 3 plays.

The reason I don't like this is because it leaves out the younger or bottom teams. The nice thing about a league challenge is that each game counts the same, so the bottom teams rep the league as much as the top ones. The way this is spelled out, there is really no reason to play the bottom games, as they are meaningless with the top games being worth so much more. No reason for lower teams to play.

It will have to be one or the other.

How about WL teams play but all games are equal?

in...

Originally posted by nthomas
The reason I don't like this is because it leaves out the younger or bottom teams. The nice thing about a league challenge is that each game counts the same, so the bottom teams rep the league as much as the top ones. The way this is spelled out, there is really no reason to play the bottom games, as they are meaningless with the top games being worth so much more. No reason for lower teams to play.

It will have to be one or the other.

Maybe it doesn't have to be such a large gap

#1 seeds game = 3 points
#2 seeds game = 3 points
#3 seeds game = 3 points
#4 seeds game = 2 points
#5 seeds game = 2 points
All other seeds games = 1 point

Not going to ask my owner to waste flex if our game is only worth a fraction of the others...

SB is in, if you need us, we will be booked all season it looks like.