http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1901751 - I was undecided on where to go with build and got caught in no mans land. I'm thinking it's going to end up being pretty worthless. Should I just retire or should I just pound jumping and try a towering man build?
Just create DTs with the knowledge that you wont get any stats, BUT they are a must for legitimate title contenders. DT/NT is essential for making everyone else on D look good
Im gonna quit worrying about SPD for DTs and just Pump STR/AGI/VIS/TCK to atsronomical heights
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by foshizzel17
Im gonna quit worrying about SPD for DTs and just Pump STR/AGI/VIS/TCK to atsronomical heights
super high tackling doesn't really do anything either. The difference between 85 tackling and 65 tackling is about 3-4 made tackles per season and possibly 1-2 FF if you are lucky.
Im gonna quit worrying about SPD for DTs and just Pump STR/AGI/VIS/TCK to atsronomical heights
super high tackling doesn't really do anything either. The difference between 85 tackling and 65 tackling is about 3-4 made tackles per season and possibly 1-2 FF if you are lucky.
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
Originally posted by foshizzel17
Im gonna quit worrying about SPD for DTs and just Pump STR/AGI/VIS/TCK to atsronomical heights
super high tackling doesn't really do anything either. The difference between 85 tackling and 65 tackling is about 3-4 made tackles per season and possibly 1-2 FF if you are lucky.
but the lolbars are so intimidating........
Originally posted by foshizzel17
Im gonna quit worrying about SPD for DTs and just Pump STR/AGI/VIS/TCK to atsronomical heights
super high tackling doesn't really do anything either. The difference between 85 tackling and 65 tackling is about 3-4 made tackles per season and possibly 1-2 FF if you are lucky.
but the lolbars are so intimidating........
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by foshizzel17
but the lolbars are so intimidating........
that's true. What is funny is that tackling raises the pass rushing bar more than speed does.
but the lolbars are so intimidating........
that's true. What is funny is that tackling raises the pass rushing bar more than speed does.
Originally posted by toobad4u_00
does tackling perhaps increase the tackling radius?
yes.
does tackling perhaps increase the tackling radius?
yes.
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by toobad4u_00
does tackling perhaps increase the tackling radius?
tackling is still important, just not important enough to need 90 natural
does tackling perhaps increase the tackling radius?
tackling is still important, just not important enough to need 90 natural
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by toobad4u_00
does tackling perhaps increase the tackling radius?
Originally posted by foshizzel17
yes.
Supposedly, but I haven't seen anything from the teams I GM and have players on which has shown that players with 20-25 more points in tackling get any more tackling opportunities than other DTs on the same team.
does tackling perhaps increase the tackling radius?
Originally posted by foshizzel17
yes.
Supposedly, but I haven't seen anything from the teams I GM and have players on which has shown that players with 20-25 more points in tackling get any more tackling opportunities than other DTs on the same team.
Forbin
offline
offline
I think that old tackling radius argument is BS. It probably increases the radius, but by an amount so small that it's close to irrelevant. Fact is, DTs with 61 tackling perform better than DTs with 85 tackling, simply because they've got SP spent elsewhere.
And, by perform better, I mean they look really, really scary as they rack up the hurries and sack failures.
And, by perform better, I mean they look really, really scary as they rack up the hurries and sack failures.
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by Forbin
I think that old tackling radius argument is BS. It probably increases the radius, but by an amount so small that it's close to irrelevant. Fact is, DTs with 61 tackling perform better than DTs with 85 tackling, simply because they've got SP spent elsewhere.
And, by perform better, I mean they look really, really scary as they rack up the hurries and sack failures.
You must be thinking of DTs before they were limited to the new set positions.
I think that old tackling radius argument is BS. It probably increases the radius, but by an amount so small that it's close to irrelevant. Fact is, DTs with 61 tackling perform better than DTs with 85 tackling, simply because they've got SP spent elsewhere.
And, by perform better, I mean they look really, really scary as they rack up the hurries and sack failures.
You must be thinking of DTs before they were limited to the new set positions.
toobad4u_00
offline
offline
Originally posted by bug03
tackling is still important, just not important enough to need 90 natural
Yeah, that was certainly not the point I was trying to make. Simply that it does not go against intuition that tackling radius helps a DT in pass rush lolbars than speed does. However, it is completely screwed up that it doesn't seem to help much after 65 or so. Though, I do think it is safe to say that nothing really seems to create a DT that perform exceptionally well from what I have seen.
tackling is still important, just not important enough to need 90 natural
Yeah, that was certainly not the point I was trying to make. Simply that it does not go against intuition that tackling radius helps a DT in pass rush lolbars than speed does. However, it is completely screwed up that it doesn't seem to help much after 65 or so. Though, I do think it is safe to say that nothing really seems to create a DT that perform exceptionally well from what I have seen.
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by toobad4u_00
I do think it is safe to say that nothing really seems to create a DT that performs well
fyp
I do think it is safe to say that nothing really seems to create a DT that performs well
fyp
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
