Warrior General Games

First, everyone please be respectful and stay on topic. An admin advised me on the most do-able option for us, that is win/win for all.


The suggestion is to have RENTAL custom cost 100 flex points non-refundable for a one season rental. Granted this is more expensive than a longterm player pays per season to own their custom, but it is a huge savings per season on our one and done players buying custom for one season and retiring. Regular custom pieces will still be available at the current price and still last for your players career. You can choose what type of custom piece benefits the type of player you are building, Long term Ownership or Short term rental for one and done pee wee dots.

Long story short, is we would be getting custom equiptment for 100 nonrefundable flex for one season.

Please show support for this with a plus one, no arguing or going off topic on other glb issues.

This may be our best and last chance to adjust this, if we can all agree.

Edit for some attempt at clarity

+1

needs to be done

can also have the option at the end of the season to convert it to regular CEQ for the price difference so that you can keep it if your player moves on

+1

I'd agree to that.

+1

Id buy custom if that was the case.

If regular custom is still available then many people will do both.

Now:
Some do no CE
Some do 600 flex refundable CE

Proposed
Some do no CE
Some do new 100 flex CE
Some do 100 and 600 flex CE

Unless I misread?

+1

Originally posted by The Duff Man


Unless I misread?

No, it probably wasn't stated clearly. You could buy both if you wanted too,butt his would be an either or type of thing as far as equipping it goes. You can only equip one piece of custom just like now. Currently you can own more than one piece,but only "wear" one piece.

either buy no custom.

or buy a custom piece at 600 flex refundable(same as now), stays with you for your career.

or buy a one season rental piece for 100 flex nonrefundable. Same as regular custom but more suited for test builds and peewee.

vote no since i still wouldnt do it but a lot more other people would

+1

+1

+1

+1.

any cost reduction for pee-wee's is a good step in the right direction.

Originally posted by Galithor
+1.

any cost reduction for pee-wee's is a good step in the right direction.

a-men to that