Warrior General Games

This rating was calculated by finding the average ranking of each team using 19 statistical categories, then adding the number of losses. This is simply for fun and discussion as these numbers will definitely change dramatically as the season progresses. At this point, some teams have faced either vastly superior or inferior teams, so the results will naturally be skewed a bit. Enjoy!

1 Bootleggerz 4.211
2 Marauders II 4.947
3 Bulls 8.895
4 Marchers 9.895
5 Toros 10.421
6 Fighters 10.842
7 Rocks 10.842
8 Bengals 12.105
9 Six Shooters 12.316
10 Vikings 14.158
11 All-Stars 14.421
12 PPE 14.947
13 Demons 15.211
14 Waterloo 15.526
15 Battalion 17.158
16 Scorpions 17.316
17 Sidewinders 18.368
18 Detroit 18.684
19 Blue Bishops 19.316
20 Longhorns 21.158
21 Kahunas 21.947
22 Steel Curtain 21.947
23 Posse 22.105
24 Rough Riders 22.474
25 Musclefrogs 22.526
26 Mudlarks 24.842
27 Nevada 26.263
28 Maniacs 27.000
29 Sharpshooters 28.158
30 Pasadena 28.211
31 Wolverines 28.895
32 Blues 30.895


The following statistical categories were used:

Pass Yds, Comp %, Yds/Comp, Pass TD, INT Thrown, Sacked, Pass YD Allowed, Pass TD Allowed, Rush Yds, Rushing Avg, Rush TD, Rush Yd Allowed, Rush TD Allowed, KR Avg, PR Avg, Sacks, INT, Fum Rec, Pancakes

edit: Name change Ghosts to Marchers

USB USB USB USB

Detroit at 18? we just beat the Scorpions... how are they ahead of us?

Intresting, the strength of schedule for the first 3 has alot to do with this, some have played weaker opponents and some stronger. I agree with your early statement you made in another thread BGM1969, that this really is not a good indicator till closer till the end of the season when most teams have played each other.

That's right. It becomes more valid as the season rolls on. For example, Oklahoma has beat up on two of the weakest teams in the conference. And, even though the Scorpions lost to Detroit, they have put up slightly better numbers statistically. All this really is at this point is a jumping off point for discussion and speculation.

A little disappointed... based on stats, yeah, the Six Shooters don't put up the big numbers but we don't give them up either.

One of only 7 undefeated teams in the entire BBB #3 and we are ranked 9th.


Like the others, this is good for speculation... but paper doesn't make the game.


Nice work though.

Originally posted by DdgDktaRlz
A little disappointed... based on stats, yeah, the Six Shooters don't put up the big numbers but we don't give them up either.

One of only 7 undefeated teams in the entire BBB #3 and we are ranked 9th.


Like the others, this is good for speculation... but paper doesn't make the game.


Nice work though.

There are three statistical things that are really dragging your team's rating down. You don't cause many turnovers, you allow too many passing TDs and you have a lower rushing average. On the plus side, you have an outstanding pass completion percentage, you don't allow many rushing TDs and you protect your QB well.

You've also only played one really inferior team so far. The other two were quite competitive.

Last season, Vegas (the league champion) was sixth in the end of season ratings, and yet stormed to the championship and beat the number one rated team. So, these ratings are definitely only part of the story.

Originally posted by jimmycongo
USB USB USB USB

BobJames4MVP

Originally posted by bgm1969

There are three statistical things that are really dragging your team's rating down. You don't cause many turnovers, you allow too many passing TDs and you have a lower rushing average. On the plus side, you have an outstanding pass completion percentage, you don't allow many rushing TDs and you protect your QB well.

You've also only played one really inferior team so far. The other two were quite competitive.

Last season, Vegas (the league champion) was sixth in the end of season ratings, and yet stormed to the championship and beat the number one rated team. So, these ratings are definitely only part of the story.

I won't get into the analytical aspect of it all... but the top 2 teams played Chicago and have overblown stats due to those games.

Kinda hard when we don't get a team like Chicago to walk all over. (No offense meant towards Chicago at all... but you helped to a point)


Honestly.... it is good for speculation but the virtue behind it is slanted.

Originally posted by DdgDktaRlz
I won't get into the analytical aspect of it all... but the top 2 teams played Chicago and have overblown stats due to those games.

Kinda hard when we don't get a team like Chicago to walk all over. (No offense meant towards Chicago at all... but you helped to a point)


Honestly.... it is good for speculation but the virtue behind it is slanted.

you played last season's least successful team in your first game, who honolulu managed to pad their stats against a week later. you also havent played a playoff team from last season yet. with USB coming up, you've had likely the weakest front schedule so far so it's hard to fault another team for whooping the teams they're supposed to. it's just a stat based comparisson after 3 games ... it'll even out as everyone plays eachother.

Originally posted by Jdog21b
Detroit at 18? we just beat the Scorpions... how are they ahead of us?











we did move up 2 spots

Thx for the work in putting that together bgm1969! makes for interesting conversation.

looks good to me

So wait... we are going by stats? Well look at the last game with Detroit and the Scorpions. We had more yards overall and held them to their lowest point totals all year. I am not going to complain about a couple spots but it is however weird that a 1-2 team is higher than a 2-1 team

Originally posted by ultimatesooner
looks good to me

I'm sure it would!