You got some Splaining to do
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
You got some Splaining to do
could have at least gutted some of those guys to my team in SA 3.
As for the Hawks owner, he will let his teams play on the field do all the talking. Why don't we see how they perform first?
You got some Splaining to do
could have at least gutted some of those guys to my team in SA 3.
As for the Hawks owner, he will let his teams play on the field do all the talking. Why don't we see how they perform first?
Last edited Jun 16, 2008 09:46:19
intoxxx
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ubasstards
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
You got some Splaining to do
could have at least gutted some of those guys to my team in SA 3.
As for the Hawks owner, he will let his teams play on the field do all the talking. Why don't we see how they perform first?
Too bad we don't play them tommorow, we might win one! xD
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
You got some Splaining to do
could have at least gutted some of those guys to my team in SA 3.
As for the Hawks owner, he will let his teams play on the field do all the talking. Why don't we see how they perform first?
Too bad we don't play them tommorow, we might win one! xD
SAVAGE OPS
offline
offline
Originally posted by intoxxx
Originally posted by Ubasstards
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
You got some Splaining to do
could have at least gutted some of those guys to my team in SA 3.
As for the Hawks owner, he will let his teams play on the field do all the talking. Why don't we see how they perform first?
Too bad we don't play them tommorow, we might win one! xD
Well, they are looking like Mutes right now. I would have rather played the Competitive Seattle team.
Originally posted by Ubasstards
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
You got some Splaining to do
could have at least gutted some of those guys to my team in SA 3.
As for the Hawks owner, he will let his teams play on the field do all the talking. Why don't we see how they perform first?
Too bad we don't play them tommorow, we might win one! xD
Well, they are looking like Mutes right now. I would have rather played the Competitive Seattle team.
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
Well, they are looking like Mutes right now. I would have rather played the Competitive Seattle team.
Yeah, kinda boring getting a Bye week handed to every team.
Well, they are looking like Mutes right now. I would have rather played the Competitive Seattle team.
Yeah, kinda boring getting a Bye week handed to every team.
tomcollins
offline
offline
Originally posted by Meech
Sky Hawks,make sure you say Sky Hawks!
Yours Truly,
Maine Hawks
We have the Golden Hawks, the Skyhawks, the Hawks, and the Nighthawks. Popular name I guess.
Sky Hawks,make sure you say Sky Hawks!
Yours Truly,
Maine Hawks
We have the Golden Hawks, the Skyhawks, the Hawks, and the Nighthawks. Popular name I guess.
showtime!
offline
offline
Originally posted by intoxxx
Does the Oakland TurtleHawks sound catchy?
lol. Do it. Do it.
Does the Oakland TurtleHawks sound catchy?
lol. Do it. Do it.
shadow46x2
offline
offline
ohhh....
that's the old majestics team....from the guy who "didn't want to manage his players and coach at the same time"...
then got his entire team traded....
*ponder*
wonder how that "i don't want to work so hard" mentality is going to work out when he's playing for 20+ different teams
--j
that's the old majestics team....from the guy who "didn't want to manage his players and coach at the same time"...
then got his entire team traded....
*ponder*
wonder how that "i don't want to work so hard" mentality is going to work out when he's playing for 20+ different teams
--j
Last edited Jun 16, 2008 23:06:42
Yeremiah
offline
offline
Originally posted by shadow46x2
ohhh....
that's the old majestics team....from the guy who "didn't want to manage his players and coach at the same time"...
then got his entire team traded....
*ponder*
wonder how that "i don't want to work so hard" mentality is going to work out when he's playing for 20+ different teams
--j
Be hard to watch 20 different games. At least you would always have something to do though.
ohhh....
that's the old majestics team....from the guy who "didn't want to manage his players and coach at the same time"...
then got his entire team traded....
*ponder*
wonder how that "i don't want to work so hard" mentality is going to work out when he's playing for 20+ different teams
--j
Be hard to watch 20 different games. At least you would always have something to do though.
Product_08
offline
offline
well its gonna be a nice easy blowout win for ever team who plays them soon, I bet they'll have a better team by the time they play Fresno but. lol
jnewkirk
offline
offline
Dont know about that since not one of the Owner/GMs will answer ant questions players have in the forums. And where is the auto-generated CPU players that is susposed to happen when and if you go below the roster cap.
tomcollins
offline
offline
Originally posted by jnewkirk
Dont know about that since not one of the Owner/GMs will answer ant questions players have in the forums. And where is the auto-generated CPU players that is susposed to happen when and if you go below the roster cap.
Looks like that code got removed after they fixed the way to get under 40 players per team. The bug in doing it in trades still appears though.
Dont know about that since not one of the Owner/GMs will answer ant questions players have in the forums. And where is the auto-generated CPU players that is susposed to happen when and if you go below the roster cap.
Looks like that code got removed after they fixed the way to get under 40 players per team. The bug in doing it in trades still appears though.
AgentTBC
offline
offline
Has anyone contacted Bort or an Admin type about this? They need to be auto-filled by CPU players ASAP.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
