Warrior General Games

As you guys may remember, I was against coaches for pee wee last time they tried to introduce them. My position has changed, now I am against coaches entirely for all cap leagues, but my focus is almost solely pee wee anyway. I don't think coaches would improve pee wee, and we need to keep them out of here. However, the 50 man roster might be better received. I don't think that is a problem since it affects all pee wee teams evenly. What do you guys think?

Links:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3921528
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3922577

It's a money grab! ...it is about bort getting agents more involved/committed to the game, which equates in more flexies and $ for the bort imo

Originally posted by ManOgwaR
It's a money grab! ...it is about bort getting agents more involved/committed to the game, which equates in more flexies and $ for the bort imo

50 man rosters don't sound like a money grab though

Originally posted by jkid2
50 man rosters don't sound like a money grab though

it is if instead of making STOP centers for 100 flex people have to start making real players so they can actually find a spot on a team. more skill players=more flexies=more cash for the bortster

less on each team would equate to more teams ...a lot of teams don't necessarily use the 55man roster anywayz

My last 4-5 players I roll for my team are STOP players anyway. I would hate to lose them for energy purposes (every STOP player is one less regular I have to put on STs) so I would be against the 50-player roster. It would only influence my recruiting, though, and would affect every team the same. Not sure about coaches.

I think with the new rule that agents have to find a team in order to train should help fill the rosters tbh.

The 50 man roster is fine, I don't fill mine anyway, but I think coaches is just retarded, their are 100 other non-working features that could use adjustment before they bother throwing another sack of bugs at us.

As a previous and current game developer I know what new things bring, and thats new problems, even though the games in "beta" its been that way for far too long to keep using that as an excuse... I'd much rather see this time spent on simulation corrections and general improvement to the already existing features of the game, rather than some flashy excuse for an "addition" that will likely either impact the game little to none or be vastly opposed to.

The thing is the forum users are the players that are active and voiced in their opinions, the rest of the people are the ones too dumb to realize the games flawed as is, and they just see the flashy "New" word in the polls and vote yes, hence admins assume the best thing for the game is to throw enough "New" at us that we won't keep nagging about the broken.

I've always thought poles should be held in the forum, and it isn't something you should be warned of when you log in, but rather something you have to check on... because what players really matter besides the ones who are actively involved in the community of the game and actually promote the well being of it by doing so.

Then maybe their will be less level 1 people who don't plan to play more than a week influencing huge decision like this.

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
The 50 man roster is fine, I don't fill mine anyway, but I think coaches is just retarded, their are 100 other non-working features that could use adjustment before they bother throwing another sack of bugs at us.

As a previous and current game developer I know what new things bring, and thats new problems, even though the games in "beta" its been that way for far too long to keep using that as an excuse... I'd much rather see this time spent on simulation corrections and general improvement to the already existing features of the game, rather than some flashy excuse for an "addition" that will likely either impact the game little to none or be vastly opposed to.

The thing is the forum users are the players that are active and voiced in their opinions, the rest of the people are the ones too dumb to realize the games flawed as is, and they just see the flashy "New" word in the polls and vote yes, hence admins assume the best thing for the game is to throw enough "New" at us that we won't keep nagging about the broken.

I've always thought poles should be held in the forum, and it isn't something you should be warned of when you log in, but rather something you have to check on... because what players really matter besides the ones who are actively involved in the community of the game and actually promote the well being of it by doing so.

Then maybe their will be less level 1 people who don't plan to play more than a week influencing huge decision like this.

Poll, not pole. Just sayin.

Originally posted by OH-IO
Poll, not pole. Just sayin.

Jesus are you the grammar policeor something?

Originally posted by Godisgreat
Jesus

Coming from God

Yeah the 50 man roster is kinda like the "No Day 31 players" rule. It will negatively affect all of us so it should be fair and create more FA's for teams.

bla, 50 man rosters suck, I dont use Special teams only players. I like having 7 Wrs and 3 Hbs along with 3 Qbs. Might as well go back to where all we do is run slams all game and let penalties decide who wins. They already cut it down from unlimited to 55. Next thing we'll be pushing for 40 man rosters. Where is the limit?

No point in fighting this one, Catch has said that it is all but implemented. It is just going to be a question of how soon.

Hopefully they give me a few seasons so that I can retire some of my older players and make them Pee Wee coaches.

I will have five, and will be unstoppable.

:Mwahaha: