Yes, I know rankings at this point are fairly worthless. Still, it's something to help us along the slow offseason.
So, what's your best guess for the top contenders?
So, what's your best guess for the top contenders?
Forum > Pro Leagues > World League Rankings: What's your best guess?
1. Haliblack Explosionaries
2. Three Kingdom Warriors
3. Machu Pichu Hidden Dragons
4. New Jersey Blaze
5. Bonn Dynamo
6. Monmouth Evil Monkeys
7. Lincoln Navigators
8. Stewart Ballers
9. KC Rams
10. Mayan Prophecy
2. Three Kingdom Warriors
3. Machu Pichu Hidden Dragons
4. New Jersey Blaze
5. Bonn Dynamo
6. Monmouth Evil Monkeys
7. Lincoln Navigators
8. Stewart Ballers
9. KC Rams
10. Mayan Prophecy
djgomez33
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gart888
1. Haliblack Explosionaries
2. Three Kingdom Warriors
3. Machu Pichu Hidden Dragons
4. New Jersey Blaze
5. Bonn Dynamo
6. Monmouth Evil Monkeys
7. Lincoln Navigators
8. Stewart Ballers
9. KC Rams
10. Mayan Prophecy
Wow, Lincoln was a top 2-4 team last season and you dropped us to 7th? Ouch!
1. Haliblack Explosionaries
2. Three Kingdom Warriors
3. Machu Pichu Hidden Dragons
4. New Jersey Blaze
5. Bonn Dynamo
6. Monmouth Evil Monkeys
7. Lincoln Navigators
8. Stewart Ballers
9. KC Rams
10. Mayan Prophecy
Wow, Lincoln was a top 2-4 team last season and you dropped us to 7th? Ouch!
Originally posted by djgomez33
Originally posted by Gart888
1. Haliblack Explosionaries
2. Three Kingdom Warriors
3. Machu Pichu Hidden Dragons
4. New Jersey Blaze
5. Bonn Dynamo
6. Monmouth Evil Monkeys
7. Lincoln Navigators
8. Stewart Ballers
9. KC Rams
10. Mayan Prophecy
Wow, Lincoln was a top 2-4 team last season and you dropped us to 7th? Ouch!
I thought you were all season 1 players? All the teams i bumped above you guys are younger.
Originally posted by Gart888
1. Haliblack Explosionaries
2. Three Kingdom Warriors
3. Machu Pichu Hidden Dragons
4. New Jersey Blaze
5. Bonn Dynamo
6. Monmouth Evil Monkeys
7. Lincoln Navigators
8. Stewart Ballers
9. KC Rams
10. Mayan Prophecy
Wow, Lincoln was a top 2-4 team last season and you dropped us to 7th? Ouch!
I thought you were all season 1 players? All the teams i bumped above you guys are younger.
Plus, your star player Johnny GoRoute gets shut down wayyyyyy too easily to be considered a top team.
jamz
offline
offline
Originally posted by djgomez33
Wow, Lincoln was a top 2-4 team last season and you dropped us to 7th? Ouch!
Gart mad
Wow, Lincoln was a top 2-4 team last season and you dropped us to 7th? Ouch!
Gart mad
Originally posted by crazy454
M.o.D. should be 32nd with the shit chem
A back loaded schedule could save your asses. BFM's problem last season was that as soon as our chem recovered a bit, we were facing morale issues. Our older guys were able to train night on the town, but young'ins need those bonus tokens.
M.o.D. should be 32nd with the shit chem
A back loaded schedule could save your asses. BFM's problem last season was that as soon as our chem recovered a bit, we were facing morale issues. Our older guys were able to train night on the town, but young'ins need those bonus tokens.
coachviking
offline
offline
1. Hali-If they have Solid dots behind Jedi and Dooley when the Decline really sucks them dry
2. TKW-Best young talent, Minimal turnover
3. NJB-Nice additions
4. MPHD-Taut Builds Good dots
5. Monmouth-Hey I can see our new dots builds sooooo, I'm pretty happy
6. KC Rams-DIS TEAM IS FREAKING FAST
7. Lincoln-Serious roster turnover BUT they always bring in the best
8. Bonn-Year in and year out they know what their doing
9. Valhalla-W_alloy builds REALLY good dots also
10. Mayan-Mayan too low
It's going to be a very interesting year. A huge amount of turnover and a bunch of first time WL dots. Not many of the old school guys still around
2. TKW-Best young talent, Minimal turnover
3. NJB-Nice additions
4. MPHD-Taut Builds Good dots
5. Monmouth-Hey I can see our new dots builds sooooo, I'm pretty happy
6. KC Rams-DIS TEAM IS FREAKING FAST
7. Lincoln-Serious roster turnover BUT they always bring in the best
8. Bonn-Year in and year out they know what their doing
9. Valhalla-W_alloy builds REALLY good dots also
10. Mayan-Mayan too low
It's going to be a very interesting year. A huge amount of turnover and a bunch of first time WL dots. Not many of the old school guys still around
Edited by coachviking on Nov 25, 2009 08:21:10
Joebarber
offline
offline
Originally posted by coachviking
1. Hali-If they have Solid dots behind Jedi and Dooley when the Decline really sucks them dry
2. TKW-Best young talent, Minimal turnover
3. NJB-Nice additions
4. MPHD-Taut Builds Good dots
5. Monmouth-Hey I can see our new dots builds sooooo, I'm pretty happy
6. KC Rams-DIS TEAM IS FREAKING FAST
7. Lincoln-Serious roster turnover BUT they always bring in the best
8. Bonn-Year in and year out they know what their doing
9. Valhalla-W_alloy builds REALLY good dots also
10. Mayan-Mayan too low
It's going to be a very interesting year. A huge amount of turnover and a bunch of first time WL dots. Not many of the old school guys still around
Vahalla isn't very good tbh
1. Hali-If they have Solid dots behind Jedi and Dooley when the Decline really sucks them dry
2. TKW-Best young talent, Minimal turnover
3. NJB-Nice additions
4. MPHD-Taut Builds Good dots
5. Monmouth-Hey I can see our new dots builds sooooo, I'm pretty happy
6. KC Rams-DIS TEAM IS FREAKING FAST
7. Lincoln-Serious roster turnover BUT they always bring in the best
8. Bonn-Year in and year out they know what their doing
9. Valhalla-W_alloy builds REALLY good dots also
10. Mayan-Mayan too low
It's going to be a very interesting year. A huge amount of turnover and a bunch of first time WL dots. Not many of the old school guys still around
Vahalla isn't very good tbh
head1
offline
offline
Originally posted by crazy454
M.o.D. should be 32nd with the shit chem
Dibs on MoD game 2.
M.o.D. should be 32nd with the shit chem
Dibs on MoD game 2.
GP1
offline
offline
We had minimal turnover, and our season 2/3 dots proved they are exceptional.
tl;dr- mayan too low
tl;dr- mayan too low
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
