120 strength
100 agility
72 speed
61 tackling
52 stamina
54 confidence
54 vision
4-7-0-0-0
4-7-3-4-11
100 agility
72 speed
61 tackling
52 stamina
54 confidence
54 vision
4-7-0-0-0
4-7-3-4-11
Darren McFadden
offline
offline
I think he'd help. I don't know that he'd be a great playmaker on his own, speed isn't high enough to be a great pass rusher, jumping too low to knock passes down, low shed blocks hinders ability to beat one on one matchups. Low tackling requires balanced tactics, reducing fumbles.
Kayoh
offline
offline
since we're whipping out level 60 builds, here's my NT's
Strength: 135.51
Agility: 87.51
Speed: 77.61
Tackling: 59.51
Vision: 55.61
Confidence: 51.61
Strength: 135.51
Agility: 87.51
Speed: 77.61
Tackling: 59.51
Vision: 55.61
Confidence: 51.61
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kayoh
since we're whipping out level 60 builds, here's my NT's
Strength: 135.51
Agility: 87.51
Speed: 77.61
Tackling: 59.51
Vision: 55.61
Confidence: 51.61
I think he would do better with 122.51 strength and 100.51 agility.
I know the popular belief is to get one of the 2 as high as possible, but I have found you want a very high strength + agility total score, but typically perform better when the 2 are more balanced.
since we're whipping out level 60 builds, here's my NT's
Strength: 135.51
Agility: 87.51
Speed: 77.61
Tackling: 59.51
Vision: 55.61
Confidence: 51.61
I think he would do better with 122.51 strength and 100.51 agility.
I know the popular belief is to get one of the 2 as high as possible, but I have found you want a very high strength + agility total score, but typically perform better when the 2 are more balanced.
shlominus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
but I have found you want a very high strength + agility total score
aye!
but I have found you want a very high strength + agility total score
aye!
Redrover
offline
offline
isn't the "do you pancake this person?" and "do you stun this person?" rolls based off of the difference between your strength/agility and their strength/agility? i.e. you'd want one of them to be really high to insure a reverse pancake or stun.
Chugga
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kayoh
since we're whipping out level 60 builds, here's my NT's
Strength: 135.51
Agility: 87.51
Speed: 77.61
Tackling: 59.51
Vision: 55.61
Confidence: 51.61
At high levels you'd accomplish little to nothing even with the sick strength total. You look at the top NT/DTs in the World League and none of them are strength beasts.
since we're whipping out level 60 builds, here's my NT's
Strength: 135.51
Agility: 87.51
Speed: 77.61
Tackling: 59.51
Vision: 55.61
Confidence: 51.61
At high levels you'd accomplish little to nothing even with the sick strength total. You look at the top NT/DTs in the World League and none of them are strength beasts.
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by Redrover
isn't the "do you pancake this person?" and "do you stun this person?" rolls based off of the difference between your strength/agility and their strength/agility? i.e. you'd want one of them to be really high to insure a reverse pancake or stun.
And which one do you think you are more likely to have an advantage on over a C?
Think about it, the Cs that were started in season 6 or later are going to be going with 135+ strength. Some over 140. However, most of them are only going to have 75-80 agility.
Which do you think is more likely to beat those C's
135/87 or 120/102?
isn't the "do you pancake this person?" and "do you stun this person?" rolls based off of the difference between your strength/agility and their strength/agility? i.e. you'd want one of them to be really high to insure a reverse pancake or stun.
And which one do you think you are more likely to have an advantage on over a C?
Think about it, the Cs that were started in season 6 or later are going to be going with 135+ strength. Some over 140. However, most of them are only going to have 75-80 agility.
Which do you think is more likely to beat those C's
135/87 or 120/102?
Nv1sion
offline
offline
Originally posted by Redrover
isn't the "do you pancake this person?" and "do you stun this person?" rolls based off of the difference between your strength/agility and their strength/agility? i.e. you'd want one of them to be really high to insure a reverse pancake or stun.
Agility would increase number of chances to rev cake and strength increases chances of each rev cake, so having high on both would be good.
isn't the "do you pancake this person?" and "do you stun this person?" rolls based off of the difference between your strength/agility and their strength/agility? i.e. you'd want one of them to be really high to insure a reverse pancake or stun.
Agility would increase number of chances to rev cake and strength increases chances of each rev cake, so having high on both would be good.
r71runner
offline
offline
Originally posted by Nv1sion
Agility would increase number of chances to rev cake and strength increases chances of each rev cake, so having high on both would be good.
come again?
are you trying to say?
agi controls how many rolls you recieve
str control how well you do on those rolls
Agility would increase number of chances to rev cake and strength increases chances of each rev cake, so having high on both would be good.
come again?
are you trying to say?
agi controls how many rolls you recieve
str control how well you do on those rolls
Darren McFadden
offline
offline
Originally posted by r71runner
come again?
are you trying to say?
agi controls how many rolls you recieve
str control how well you do on those rolls
that's not completely correct. the sum total affects how many rolls you recieve, it is the base for that roll. the effect of winning that roll is partially determined individually by those two attributes. it's not like nothing happens if you don't have one particularly high. you will still win the roll and stun the blocker.
come again?
are you trying to say?
agi controls how many rolls you recieve
str control how well you do on those rolls
that's not completely correct. the sum total affects how many rolls you recieve, it is the base for that roll. the effect of winning that roll is partially determined individually by those two attributes. it's not like nothing happens if you don't have one particularly high. you will still win the roll and stun the blocker.
tautology
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
120 strength
100 agility
72 speed
61 tackling
52 stamina
54 confidence
54 vision
4-7-0-0-0
4-7-3-4-11
If it were me, I would take speed down by 12 points (35 or so SPs) and put those points into things that make a NT good (Wall, Shed Block, Break Through, Vision, Tackling, etc).
You won't get as much pass rush of course. I like that build more as a DT (but without DLG of obviously)
120 strength
100 agility
72 speed
61 tackling
52 stamina
54 confidence
54 vision
4-7-0-0-0
4-7-3-4-11
If it were me, I would take speed down by 12 points (35 or so SPs) and put those points into things that make a NT good (Wall, Shed Block, Break Through, Vision, Tackling, etc).
You won't get as much pass rush of course. I like that build more as a DT (but without DLG of obviously)
Nv1sion
offline
offline
Originally posted by Darren McFadden
that's not completely correct. the sum total affects how many rolls you recieve, it is the base for that roll. the effect of winning that roll is partially determined individually by those two attributes. it's not like nothing happens if you don't have one particularly high. you will still win the roll and stun the blocker.
Based on what I've seen, agility plays a much larger part in the break block percentage, and strength plays a larger role in reverse pancakes.
that's not completely correct. the sum total affects how many rolls you recieve, it is the base for that roll. the effect of winning that roll is partially determined individually by those two attributes. it's not like nothing happens if you don't have one particularly high. you will still win the roll and stun the blocker.
Based on what I've seen, agility plays a much larger part in the break block percentage, and strength plays a larger role in reverse pancakes.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
