User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > CB Club > Coverage Distance
stegall
offline
Link
 
Recently heard from another GLB'er that -75 was the general consensus for the best combo of PD's/INT's. Anyone else heard anything? Is -100 still the most popular?
Edited by stegall on Jul 6, 2009 19:08:36
 
Link
 
Edited by Fuji37 on Jul 6, 2009 20:00:42
 
Worker 3
offline
Link
 
i always use about -67
 
Underdawg08
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by stegall
Recently heard from another GLB'er that -75 was the general consensus for the best combo of PD's/INT's. Anyone else heard anything? Is -100 still the most popular?


-100 is the most popular for shut down guys.

-33 would be the best for pd's and int's But you have to have the right build.

I can see slower guys wanting to use -75 or something.
 
Iron Maiden
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by stegall

Recently heard from another GLB'er that -75 was the general consensus for the best combo of PD's/INT's. Anyone else heard anything? Is -100 still the most popular?


-100 is the most popular for shut down guys.

-33 would be the best for pd's and int's But you have to have the right build.

I can see slower guys wanting to use -75 or something.


right build is soft-capped catching/Jumping?
 
Underdawg08
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Iron Maiden
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Originally posted by stegall


Recently heard from another GLB'er that -75 was the general consensus for the best combo of PD's/INT's. Anyone else heard anything? Is -100 still the most popular?


-100 is the most popular for shut down guys.

-33 would be the best for pd's and int's But you have to have the right build.

I can see slower guys wanting to use -75 or something.


right build is soft-capped catching/Jumping?


Speedsters mainly. with the right mix of agility and catching. Jumping really doesn't need to be too high when you play off a guy. u just try to rely on pure speed to jump a route. Jumping still helps if you over jump a route though. It doesn't happen too much though.
 
mmuhr
offline
Link
 
Underdogs, people hate on you but you really do have intelligent things to say. Thinking outside the box. Respect.
Edited by mmuhr on Jul 7, 2009 11:05:06
 
Stajan
offline
Link
 
What do you think my CB would be most effective at? ~82 speed, ~58 agility or around there. He's in a 16-cap so he should be significantly faster than most WRs. Low vision, jumping, etc though.

-Would -100 be the best or would I be too slow?
-Also, aggressive or semi-aggressive? I'm playing a CPU game in 2.5 hours and would like stats if possible lol.
Edited by FIeury on Jul 7, 2009 11:14:47
Edited by FIeury on Jul 7, 2009 11:13:33
 
JD Cuda
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by FIeury
He's in a 16-cap so he should be significantly faster than most WRs.

Doubtful, imo. Speed and agility are the first two things that WRs raise as well.

If you want stats, I think aggressive's typically the way to go.
Not sure about the slider.
 
whatje
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by mmuhr
Underdogs, people hate on you but you really do have intelligent things to say. Thinking outside the box. Respect.


i don't mean to dick ride or nothing... (boondocks for the lay person)
 
Drs
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by whatje
Originally posted by mmuhr

Underdogs, people hate on you but you really do have intelligent things to say. Thinking outside the box. Respect.


i don't mean to dick ride or nothing... (boondocks for the lay person)


LOL. Underdogs is cool.
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.