http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1334358
Build is open. Rate out of 10 FOR HIS LEVEL.
Build is open. Rate out of 10 FOR HIS LEVEL.
bigg987
offline
offline
too much speed tackling and vision... for his level
and not enough strength and agility.. for his level
and youre starting too soon on SA.
and not enough strength and agility.. for his level
and youre starting too soon on SA.
mtzrocks24
offline
offline
Originally posted by bigg987
too much speed tackling and vision... for his level
and not enough strength and agility.. for his level
and youre starting too soon on SA.
Not enough strength? By the way I changed him to DT. Thanks for the feedback
too much speed tackling and vision... for his level
and not enough strength and agility.. for his level
and youre starting too soon on SA.
Not enough strength? By the way I changed him to DT. Thanks for the feedback
bigg987
offline
offline
Originally posted by mtzrocks24
Originally posted by bigg987
too much speed tackling and vision... for his level
and not enough strength and agility.. for his level
and youre starting too soon on SA.
Not enough strength? By the way I changed him to DT. Thanks for the feedback
he could and possibly should of had 68 natural str by mid teens, then it is a case of ramping up agility. once you have str and agility to 68 (i believe this to be what most people suggest as the accepted norm.) then you bring your speed up. speed and tackling trained to mid 30s whilst your taking str and agil to 68 would put you in postition to pump speed up to 68 also. and then tackling whilst working on your other atributes. i believe the common consensus to be 80s/70s/100+ str/spd/agil as the target way to build dominant DTs. slightly more str on NT.
Originally posted by bigg987
too much speed tackling and vision... for his level
and not enough strength and agility.. for his level
and youre starting too soon on SA.
Not enough strength? By the way I changed him to DT. Thanks for the feedback
he could and possibly should of had 68 natural str by mid teens, then it is a case of ramping up agility. once you have str and agility to 68 (i believe this to be what most people suggest as the accepted norm.) then you bring your speed up. speed and tackling trained to mid 30s whilst your taking str and agil to 68 would put you in postition to pump speed up to 68 also. and then tackling whilst working on your other atributes. i believe the common consensus to be 80s/70s/100+ str/spd/agil as the target way to build dominant DTs. slightly more str on NT.
Baskerville
offline
offline
4/10 seems about right for the reasons above. but honestly why would u post here if u cant accept the criticism? i know u think hes jsut the shit but seriously. read other forums before u post here.
WSUfanatic
offline
offline
Originally posted by mtzrocks24
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1334358
Build is open. Rate out of 10 FOR HIS LEVEL.
A lot of the reason's have already been mentioned. The book on building NT's is to jack up strength and agility as high as possible, and as fast as possible. DT's still want to jack up agility as fast as possible, while deciding whether or not to do the same with strength.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1334358
Build is open. Rate out of 10 FOR HIS LEVEL.
A lot of the reason's have already been mentioned. The book on building NT's is to jack up strength and agility as high as possible, and as fast as possible. DT's still want to jack up agility as fast as possible, while deciding whether or not to do the same with strength.
mtzrocks24
offline
offline
Originally posted by Baskerville
4/10 seems about right for the reasons above. but honestly why would u post here if u cant accept the criticism? i know u think hes jsut the shit but seriously. read other forums before u post here.
I can take critisism but I prefer it to be constructive. I dont want you to just post the rating, I want you to back it up.
4/10 seems about right for the reasons above. but honestly why would u post here if u cant accept the criticism? i know u think hes jsut the shit but seriously. read other forums before u post here.
I can take critisism but I prefer it to be constructive. I dont want you to just post the rating, I want you to back it up.
cbjk0703
offline
offline
Originally posted by Baskerville
4/10 seems about right for the reasons above. but honestly why would u post here if u cant accept the criticism? i know u think hes jsut the shit but seriously. read other forums before u post here.
4/10 is like an F--. I'd be afraid to put my build on here...Also all these forums I read are filled with negative comments and terrible reviews...Can someone direct me to a "good" build that is not your own??
4/10 seems about right for the reasons above. but honestly why would u post here if u cant accept the criticism? i know u think hes jsut the shit but seriously. read other forums before u post here.
4/10 is like an F--. I'd be afraid to put my build on here...Also all these forums I read are filled with negative comments and terrible reviews...Can someone direct me to a "good" build that is not your own??
Baskerville
offline
offline
the better builds are usually the ones with the least amount of comments. if theres nothing bad to say ppl, including myself soemtmes, wont say anything.
mtzrocks24
offline
offline
Ok if its 4/10 then apparently I have the worst build in history. But in that case.... why the 0 missed tackles?
bigg987
offline
offline
Originally posted by mtzrocks24
Ok if its 4/10 then apparently I have the worst build in history. But in that case.... why the 0 missed tackles?
not the worse in history... mistackles?? you aint quick/agile enough to get in postition to make enough tackles to miss a few.
i would prefer a guy who gets to the ball carrier and misses ocasionally then one that watches him stride past and can only tackle if he is run into(these are obvioulsly extremes, ive not watched your guy, but i would say he is closer to the latter)
Ok if its 4/10 then apparently I have the worst build in history. But in that case.... why the 0 missed tackles?
not the worse in history... mistackles?? you aint quick/agile enough to get in postition to make enough tackles to miss a few.
i would prefer a guy who gets to the ball carrier and misses ocasionally then one that watches him stride past and can only tackle if he is run into(these are obvioulsly extremes, ive not watched your guy, but i would say he is closer to the latter)
mtzrocks24
offline
offline
Originally posted by bigg987
Originally posted by mtzrocks24
Ok if its 4/10 then apparently I have the worst build in history. But in that case.... why the 0 missed tackles?
not the worse in history... mistackles?? you aint quick/agile enough to get in postition to make enough tackles to miss a few.
i would prefer a guy who gets to the ball carrier and misses ocasionally then one that watches him stride past and can only tackle if he is run into(these are obvioulsly extremes, ive not watched your guy, but i would say he is closer to the latter)
Also, he is playing with people above his level. It is my team and I gutted it and kept him on it. He used to be 3rd string.
Originally posted by mtzrocks24
Ok if its 4/10 then apparently I have the worst build in history. But in that case.... why the 0 missed tackles?
not the worse in history... mistackles?? you aint quick/agile enough to get in postition to make enough tackles to miss a few.
i would prefer a guy who gets to the ball carrier and misses ocasionally then one that watches him stride past and can only tackle if he is run into(these are obvioulsly extremes, ive not watched your guy, but i would say he is closer to the latter)
Also, he is playing with people above his level. It is my team and I gutted it and kept him on it. He used to be 3rd string.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
