Warrior General Games

11 games to 5 by my count. Hell, the number 10 West team just crushed the #4 East team.

That was a pounding. Do they realign the leagues next year?

No, they don't. I find this East vs. West thing pretty petty I mean theres just as good of a shot for the East to win the whole thing as the West.

But Detroit was considered one of the strongest teams in the East and Las Vegas whooped up on them.

Originally posted by jfbueno
No, they don't. I find this East vs. West thing pretty petty I mean theres just as good of a shot for the East to win the whole thing as the West.

It's all in good fun. At least for most of us!!!

Originally posted by intoxxx
But Detroit was considered one of the strongest teams in the East and Las Vegas whooped up on them.

Ok, but how does that affect the top teams in the East, Detriot lost to both of the top teams in the east so there really is no argument there.

Originally posted by intoxxx
But Detroit was considered one of the strongest teams in the East and Las Vegas whooped up on them.


thats because we sat all of our starters and only played back ups because the game didnt matter to our standings. we woulda whooped them with the starting squad

And the Gamblers even had their best game of the season

Originally posted by khull26

thats because we sat all of our starters and only played back ups because the game didnt matter to our standings. we woulda whooped them with the starting squad


Well, that was your choice. Can't use it as an excuse, you had the choice to play your starters and represent.

Some people just prefer the 'Dungy Method', you're better off taking the W than arguing with them over it.

Originally posted by khull26
Originally posted by intoxxx

But Detroit was considered one of the strongest teams in the East and Las Vegas whooped up on them.


thats because we sat all of our starters and only played back ups because the game didnt matter to our standings. we woulda whooped them with the starting squad


we would have given you a run for your money. my te did beat your first string ss for 2 tds, even if you did start your backups. im not saying we would have won, we still would have been an underdog, but i think our game plan was sound, and we would have given you a good game. i was actually surprised when we saw you had played your backups. must have been a last minute decision.

Originally posted by intoxxx
But Detroit was considered one of the strongest teams in the East and Las Vegas whooped up on them.

again, in all fairness, they did start their backups, so the results are skewed. were not going to claim were better than them, because level wise, obviously were not. but as i said in the last post, i think we had a solid game plan, and that we would have had a shot against their starters.

UM GUYS...ITS A SCRIM

My team changed the whole depth chart so kickers and punters were playing LB positions
the HB was a C


east didn't even try lol

Originally posted by Space Ranger

east didn't even try lol

That would have held more weight if you'd stated it before the West dominated the East. Saying so after that humiliating day just sounds like sour grapes.

Originally posted by JerryStegmaier
Originally posted by Space Ranger


east didn't even try lol

That would have held more weight if you'd stated it before the West dominated the East. Saying so after that humiliating day just sounds like sour grapes.

How's the offseason treating you? thanks.

Originally posted by Space Ranger
UM GUYS...ITS A SCRIM

My team changed the whole depth chart so kickers and punters were playing LB positions
the HB was a C


east didn't even try lol

I'm just thinking out loud here. If the east had been more competitive, then you guys would have had to treat it like it meant something.

That game meant the difference between being in the playoffs and what seeding we got for several west teams. We had to play because we all have very close and competitive teams.

Guess the east didn't really have that.