A lot of people on this forum advocate have been advocating taking this VA combo lately, and with the VA point reset I've been thinking about it a lot as well. However, the more napkin math I do the worse they seem.
My guy is level 35 right now and has 10 veteran points. If I put all 10 into underdog (he's in an uncapped league and less famous than most of the CBs there), he'll have a 50% chance of causing the opposing CB to have -20% vision per play where there is man to man coverage. Lets say that the average CB he lines up against at that level has 50-60 vision. That means a 10-12 point decrease in vision when Underdog fires. So, on average, assuming the CB is more famous he'll be reduced by an average of 5-6 vision points per man to man coverage play.
One argument for the Underdog/Awe Inspiring combo is that putting all your eggs in one basket is rewarded as a WR. You can be crappy with your rolls for several plays, just waiting for that one play where Head Fake and Underdog both fire, which could very well lead to a touchdown. Being exceptional some of the time is better than being above average all the time for a WR. Anyway, would be interested in hearing thoughts or criticisms of this analysis and the assumptions I made.
Edit - Removed a paragraph with bad math, you can read it in the post below!
My guy is level 35 right now and has 10 veteran points. If I put all 10 into underdog (he's in an uncapped league and less famous than most of the CBs there), he'll have a 50% chance of causing the opposing CB to have -20% vision per play where there is man to man coverage. Lets say that the average CB he lines up against at that level has 50-60 vision. That means a 10-12 point decrease in vision when Underdog fires. So, on average, assuming the CB is more famous he'll be reduced by an average of 5-6 vision points per man to man coverage play.
One argument for the Underdog/Awe Inspiring combo is that putting all your eggs in one basket is rewarded as a WR. You can be crappy with your rolls for several plays, just waiting for that one play where Head Fake and Underdog both fire, which could very well lead to a touchdown. Being exceptional some of the time is better than being above average all the time for a WR. Anyway, would be interested in hearing thoughts or criticisms of this analysis and the assumptions I made.
Edit - Removed a paragraph with bad math, you can read it in the post below!
Edited by Fumblerooski on Jun 15, 2009 00:35:49
Edited by Fumblerooski on Jun 15, 2009 00:19:07
Edited by Fumblerooski on Jun 15, 2009 00:17:03




Getting quick will give you closer to 2.1, or if your math is right but just off, 2.0946. Depending on their level most CBs have 60-68+ so your looking at them losing 12-13.6 at least. Once I start investing in HF I plan on going the quick feet route though but that combo may be a good choice.
























