User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > European Pro League > Western Europe Conference > WEPL Alpha - Average Level Season 10
Page:
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
It might be a bit early, and I am fully aware that some teams are still in full recruiting mode, but here is a first look at what the average levels around the conference currently look like. Of course the usual disclaimer applies, level does not mean everything, but as per usual it might give an indication who might have to rely on better builds, tactics or all of the above to come out a winner.

56.40 Graz Grizzlies; 52 players; median 57
56.00 Bonn Dynamo; 55 players; median 57
55.60 Greenwood Alley Cat; 45 players; median 57
55.47 artic tigers; 30 players; median 56
55.28 FootballForum Fighting Danes; 54 players; median 56
55.07 Paris Dream Bolts; 41 players; median 55
54.67 E-City Mercenaries; 48 players; median 56
54.20 Portland Rage; 49 players; median 55
53.95 Belfast Commandos; 41 players; median 55
53.79 Team Perkis; 45 players; median 54
53.38 West Wales Warriors; 53 players; median 54
53.26 Paris Philharmonic; 50 players; median 54
52.88 Hattgenstein Volunteers; 49 players; median 53
52.31 South Riding Stingrays; 54 players; median 52
51.69 Turin THUNDER; 51 players; median 52
51.33 Paris Penguins; 48 players; median 53

Of course it has to be a bit of a concern for everyone else that the last two Alpha Champions are leading the pack in average and median.

Surprisingly only one team is currently using all of the 55 player roster limit, but then recruiting is certainly still ongoing, so it might be more by the start of the season.

Contrary to the last few seasons chemistry might play a role this time around,especially early on, depending on how long the off season will last. Several teams are sitting at 100 or close to it chemistry, and a good number is somewhere in the 80s. Bringing up the rear with a chemistry of less than 70 are the tigers (btw what is it with teams nicknamed Tigers in WEPL, the last on was all caps, this one does not seem to know what a cap is at all) , given that they have by far the smallest roster at this point I think it is safe to say that they will suffer from their low chemistry at least early in the season.
 
Link
 
Why's WWW not at the bottom anymore? Booo.

Thanks for getting this up ZZ.
 
godgib
offline
Link
 
At least one ranking where we are first.
 
PFDS
offline
Link
 
so the Tigers don't believe in depth or are all their guys two way players
 
Welsh76
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PFDS
so the Tigers don't believe in depth or are all their guys two way players


I've heard rumours that they like to go both ways
 
9873101
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Welsh76
Originally posted by PFDS

so the Tigers don't believe in depth or are all their guys two way players


I've heard rumours that they like to go both ways


I've heard mostly they go one way off the field...their threesomes are not the cool kind.
Edited by 9873101 on Jun 9, 2009 16:17:58
 
Welsh76
offline
Link
 
I don't want to do anyone out of a job but here is how Alpha looks as of this morning...

56.40 average ........ Graz Grizzlies ………………………. 50 players ................ 57 median ........ 61 maximum ........ 48 minimum ........
55.96 average ........ Bonn Dynamo ……………………… 57 players ................ 57 median ........ 59 maximum ........ 42 minimum ........
55.60 average ........ Greenwood Alley Cat ……………… 45 players ................ 57 median ........ 59 maximum ........ 43 minimum ........
55.28 average ........ FootballForum Fighting Danes ….. 54 players ................ 56 median ........ 60 maximum ........ 46 minimum ........
55.19 average ........ artic tigers …………………………… 31 players ................ 55 median ........ 60 maximum ........ 50 minimum ........
55.17 average ........ Paris Dream Bolts ………………… 42 players ................ 55 median ........ 60 maximum ........ 44 minimum ........
54.82 average ........ E-City Mercenaries ………………… 50 players ................ 56 median ........ 59 maximum ........ 45 minimum ........
54.24 average ........ Portland Rage ……………………… 50 players ................ 55 median ........ 59 maximum ........ 45 minimum ........
53.78 average ........ Team Perkis ……………………….. 46 players ................ 54 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 48 minimum ........
53.66 average ........ Belfast Commandos ……………… 44 players ................ 54 median ........ 59 maximum ........ 45 minimum ........
53.60 average ........ West Wales Warriors ……………… 55 players ................ 54 median ........ 60 maximum ........ 35 minimum ........
53.32 average ........ Paris Philharmonic ………………… 50 players ................ 55 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 33 minimum ........
52.56 average ........ South Riding Stingrays …………….. 54 players ................ 52 median ........ 59 maximum ........ 46 minimum ........
51.96 average ........ Turin THUNDER …………………… 51 players ................ 52 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 44 minimum ........
51.63 average ........ Paris Penguins …………………….. 51 players ................ 53 median ........ 59 maximum ........ 34 minimum ........
50.23 average ........ Hattgenstein Volunteers ………….. 52 players ................ 53 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 7 minimum ........
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
Hmm, Bonn currently with 57 players and 7 DEs. Hey WoC, if you are thinking about cutting your own DE to get under the roster cap, send him to E-City, we are still looking to add a fourth one
 
spacetime
offline
Link
 
so at 56.42 .. Meatballs have highest avg level in WEPL. Very nice
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Zickzack
Hmm, Bonn currently with 57 players and 7 DEs. Hey WoC, if you are thinking about cutting your own DE to get under the roster cap, send him to E-City, we are still looking to add a fourth one


Lol, nice, I thought we only had 55 players. I was forgetting to count the P & K

So, I guess I have a couple cuts to make... One will be a DE, Zickzack, but I'm pretty sure it'll be retirement time.
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Wrath Of Conor

So, I guess I have a couple cuts to make... One will be a DE, Zickzack, but I'm pretty sure it'll be retirement time.


Dang, no chance I can talk that DE to keep going for one more season? I hate recruiting
 
Jayadamo
Vol4Life
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Welsh76
I don't want to do anyone out of a job but here is how Alpha looks as of this morning...


50.23 average ........ Hattgenstein Volunteers ………….. 52 players ................ 53 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 7 minimum ........


If you remove the level 7 clean up crew we have what do we end up with?
 
Mavooo
offline
Link
 
somewhere around 52.87

for a quick inaccurate way I multiplied 50.23 X 52 to get a total. Then subtracted 21 points from the 3 players @ 7ea, then divided by 49.
Edited by Mavooo on Jun 12, 2009 09:04:53
 
Welsh76
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jayadamo
Originally posted by Welsh76

I don't want to do anyone out of a job but here is how Alpha looks as of this morning...


50.23 average ........ Hattgenstein Volunteers ………….. 52 players ................ 53 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 7 minimum ........


If you remove the level 7 clean up crew we have what do we end up with?


If I remove the level 7 players you end up with...

52.88 average ........ Hattgenstein Volunteers ………….. 49 players ................ 53 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 43 minimum ........
 
Jayadamo
Vol4Life
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Welsh76
Originally posted by Jayadamo

Originally posted by Welsh76


I don't want to do anyone out of a job but here is how Alpha looks as of this morning...


50.23 average ........ Hattgenstein Volunteers ………….. 52 players ................ 53 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 7 minimum ........


If you remove the level 7 clean up crew we have what do we end up with?


If I remove the level 7 players you end up with...

52.88 average ........ Hattgenstein Volunteers ………….. 49 players ................ 53 median ........ 58 maximum ........ 43 minimum ........


Thanks. You didn't have to do it but I appreciate it.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.