I'm pretty convinced now that the
5/8 * Kick + 1/8 * CONF + 1/8 * VIS + 1/8 * AGL
equation is wrong and the better equation is
5/9 * Kick + 2/9 * CONF + 1/9 * VIS + 1/9 * AGL
It was bothering me because this kicker: http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1463512 should be 36 under the first formula and 33 under the second, and is actually showing as 33.
To test, I used SP to move my other kicker to a point which is 73.48 under the top formula (and thus a 72) and 73.62 under the bottom formula (and thus a 75). When I added that 1 attribute point to get me two those numbers, my kicker jumped to 75 on the scouting bar, leading me to believe that the bottom formula is more accurate for both of my kickers right now.
Does anyone have a bunch of kickers that they've tested and collected data on?
5/8 * Kick + 1/8 * CONF + 1/8 * VIS + 1/8 * AGL
equation is wrong and the better equation is
5/9 * Kick + 2/9 * CONF + 1/9 * VIS + 1/9 * AGL
It was bothering me because this kicker: http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1463512 should be 36 under the first formula and 33 under the second, and is actually showing as 33.
To test, I used SP to move my other kicker to a point which is 73.48 under the top formula (and thus a 72) and 73.62 under the bottom formula (and thus a 75). When I added that 1 attribute point to get me two those numbers, my kicker jumped to 75 on the scouting bar, leading me to believe that the bottom formula is more accurate for both of my kickers right now.
Does anyone have a bunch of kickers that they've tested and collected data on?






























