Just wondering.
greg420
offline
offline
50 but there is more...
I did have 24 in one year though...
I did have 24 in one year though...
Last edited May 9, 2009 14:25:09
greg420
offline
offline
Originally posted by metaldeval
i have 74 but i doubt thats highest
ever played in the pros?
i have 74 but i doubt thats highest
ever played in the pros?
Underdawg08
offline
offline
Originally posted by fallingmercury
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
Only to people who can't get any.
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
Only to people who can't get any.
spstcchicken
offline
offline
Originally posted by fallingmercury
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
Apart from the fact that stats and championships are really the only important things to players.
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
Apart from the fact that stats and championships are really the only important things to players.
mmuhr
offline
offline
Originally posted by fallingmercury
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
as "meaningless" as stats are, they make the game fun and are therefore not meaningless! You need something to brag about!
That being said, stats are meaningless in the sense that they do not show how good a CB is.
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
as "meaningless" as stats are, they make the game fun and are therefore not meaningless! You need something to brag about!
That being said, stats are meaningless in the sense that they do not show how good a CB is.
greg420
offline
offline
Originally posted by fallingmercury
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
lol that what has meaning?
cause im sure I got that too.
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
lol that what has meaning?
cause im sure I got that too.
greg420
offline
offline
Originally posted by mmuhr
Originally posted by fallingmercury
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
as "meaningless" as stats are, they make the game fun and are therefore not meaningless! You need something to brag about!
That being said, stats are meaningless in the sense that they do not show how good a CB is.
not if you know what to look for.
Originally posted by fallingmercury
Stats are meaningless in GLB.
as "meaningless" as stats are, they make the game fun and are therefore not meaningless! You need something to brag about!
That being said, stats are meaningless in the sense that they do not show how good a CB is.
not if you know what to look for.
god056
offline
offline
I have a question which I hope doesn't sound silly..
Would you rather have a good tackling cb or a good pass deflecting cb?
Would you rather have a good tackling cb or a good pass deflecting cb?
greg420
offline
offline
Originally posted by god056
I have a question which I hope doesn't sound silly..
Would you rather have a good tackling cb or a good pass deflecting cb?
well if your cb is making a tackle 90% of the time its cause he just let the WR catch the ball.
ideally you want high pd's and low tackles. that shows shutdown coverage skills.
and yes that was a stupid question
I have a question which I hope doesn't sound silly..
Would you rather have a good tackling cb or a good pass deflecting cb?
well if your cb is making a tackle 90% of the time its cause he just let the WR catch the ball.
ideally you want high pd's and low tackles. that shows shutdown coverage skills.
and yes that was a stupid question
Drs
offline
offline
Originally posted by greg420
Originally posted by god056
I have a question which I hope doesn't sound silly..
Would you rather have a good tackling cb or a good pass deflecting cb?
well if your cb is making a tackle 90% of the time its cause he just let the WR catch the ball.
ideally you want high pd's and low tackles. that shows shutdown coverage skills.
and yes that was a stupid question
I do not think that it was a stupid question.
If 90% of CB tackles are from WR catches then yes that's bad, but if they are from outside running plays then wouldn't a good tackling CB be able to stop or slow the play down. On the other hand a good pass deflecting CB probably has low str/tack skills and might miss the tackles which would then lead to a larger gain. The skills of a CB are irrelevant unless the DC knows how to maximize the usefulness of his CBs, imo.
Originally posted by god056
I have a question which I hope doesn't sound silly..
Would you rather have a good tackling cb or a good pass deflecting cb?
well if your cb is making a tackle 90% of the time its cause he just let the WR catch the ball.
ideally you want high pd's and low tackles. that shows shutdown coverage skills.
and yes that was a stupid question
I do not think that it was a stupid question.
If 90% of CB tackles are from WR catches then yes that's bad, but if they are from outside running plays then wouldn't a good tackling CB be able to stop or slow the play down. On the other hand a good pass deflecting CB probably has low str/tack skills and might miss the tackles which would then lead to a larger gain. The skills of a CB are irrelevant unless the DC knows how to maximize the usefulness of his CBs, imo.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
