User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > North American Pro League > USA Conference > Challenge to the Green Bay Maulers
Page:
 
Hukton Vioxx
offline
Link
 
I challenge Green Bay to not use the exploit logic that has made this season a joke when we play in a couple days. We will obviously do the same.

If this is going to be the first season we don't make the playoffs, I want to have a good dotball game to watch at least.

So how about it?
 
Drago
offline
Link
 
Crybaby meter updated!
 
islander1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Drago
Crybaby meter updated!


way to stay on top of things!

Who jacks that thing up more? ryan or hukton?
 
Hukton Vioxx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by islander1
Originally posted by Drago

Crybaby meter updated!


way to stay on top of things!

Who jacks that thing up more? ryan or hukton?


So issuing a challenge not to ruin the game is crying? You guys are obviously bored.
 
islander1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
Originally posted by islander1

Originally posted by Drago


Crybaby meter updated!


way to stay on top of things!

Who jacks that thing up more? ryan or hukton?


So issuing a challenge not to ruin the game is crying? You guys are obviously bored.


ruin is a matter of opinion. Are you going to order these 'challenges' in the playoffs next week too?
 
Hukton Vioxx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by islander1
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx

Originally posted by islander1


Originally posted by Drago



Crybaby meter updated!


way to stay on top of things!

Who jacks that thing up more? ryan or hukton?


So issuing a challenge not to ruin the game is crying? You guys are obviously bored.


ruin is a matter of opinion. Are you going to order these 'challenges' in the playoffs next week too?


If we are even in I would definitely be all for the entire league taking such a challenge.
 
islander1
offline
Link
 
This is the real Hukton Vioxx.

Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
The Gamblers needed their 70 players to run the ball 60 times against an opponent with 50 that they outlevel for the most part.

I'm not going to say anything else on the subject, but I absolutely believe the above statement to be true.


Summary - boo hoo boo hoo. Woes was me.

 
Hukton Vioxx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by islander1
This is the real Hukton Vioxx.

Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx

The Gamblers needed their 70 players to run the ball 60 times against an opponent with 50 that they outlevel for the most part.

I'm not going to say anything else on the subject, but I absolutely believe the above statement to be true.


Summary - boo hoo boo hoo. Woes was me.



Its called shit-talking. Its fun.
 
islander1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
Originally posted by islander1

This is the real Hukton Vioxx.

Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx


The Gamblers needed their 70 players to run the ball 60 times against an opponent with 50 that they outlevel for the most part.

I'm not going to say anything else on the subject, but I absolutely believe the above statement to be true.


Summary - boo hoo boo hoo. Woes was me.



Its called shit-talking. Its fun.


/tear
 
Snyder
offline
Link
 
I don't think I've ever seen someone call out the other team's amount of players before.
 
Hukton Vioxx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by CG
I don't think I've ever seen someone call out the other team's amount of players before.


When its a few its not a big deal. When its 20 it is, because it gives an enormous advantage on STs among other things. We need NFL-like roster limits, in my opinion, but that isn't what this thread is for.

 
islander1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
Originally posted by CG

I don't think I've ever seen someone call out the other team's amount of players before.


When its a few its not a big deal. When its 20 it is, because it gives an enormous advantage on STs among other things. We need NFL-like roster limits, in my opinion, but that isn't what this thread is for.



no, it's for crying about something else. Way to keep kleenex in business really.
 
Snyder
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
Originally posted by CG

I don't think I've ever seen someone call out the other team's amount of players before.


When its a few its not a big deal. When its 20 it is, because it gives an enormous advantage on STs among other things. We need NFL-like roster limits, in my opinion, but that isn't what this thread is for.



Apparently we suck this year but the Bullets had 40 or less when we made our title run. I don't think it makes that much of a difference either way.
 
Hukton Vioxx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by islander1
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx

Originally posted by CG


I don't think I've ever seen someone call out the other team's amount of players before.


When its a few its not a big deal. When its 20 it is, because it gives an enormous advantage on STs among other things. We need NFL-like roster limits, in my opinion, but that isn't what this thread is for.



no, it's for crying about something else. Way to keep kleenex in business really.


If we keep on like this for a few more pages, you will somehow find yourself looking like the asshole rather than me and it will be beautiful.

But, at this point I don't even care about whining or whatever the trolls like to call it. What I do care about is actually enjoying watching these dotball games again. If I have to shame other teams into not using an exploit, so be it.
 
thehazyone
NFL Replacement Refs SUCK
offline
Link
 
I'll repeat here what I posted in the other thread:

Never seen anyone complain about the number of people on our roster before. Oh well.

As for running the ball 60 times. Yea, we did, but 30 of those runs came after we were up by 8 in the 3rd quarter. It's my typical get ahead, control the clock, wear out the other team game plan. Before that we had run 32 times, passed 15 times, including passing on 1st down 5 times (if we were truly exploiting the run, we'd have just run every time on 1st down). We would have passed more too if we were in passing situations so I don't think a 2:1 ratio is that bad.

Perhaps instead of blaming the loss on stuff like that, you should look at why your team only had 57 yards of offense in the 2nd half. You basically let the Gamblers control the clock and wear your defense down with your offensive failures.

It would have been much easier, btw, to say good game and move on. When my team struggled last year (8-8) and the beginning of this year (0-4), you didn't see me coming on bitching about things. I figured out what was wrong and adapted.

Good game.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.